🚀 go-pugleaf

In my last mail I wrote:

> In gdb version 2.7, there are two places that call "malloc" directly
> instead of calling "xmalloc".  In most cases this is ok, but to make
> it perfect, I think it is a better idea to call xmalloc.
> 
> The two places are in file "stuff.c" line 116 and line 126.

I just found out that stuff.c does not even exist in the Makefile of
gdb.  So it has nothing to do with xmalloc.  Sorry about the wrong
message.

Wilson