Thread View: gnu.gdb.bug
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by James J Dempsey
Thu, 08 Feb 1990 21:32
GDB 3.5 vs. HP9000 S330 HP-UX 6.5
Author: James J Dempsey
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1990 21:32
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1990 21:32
21 lines
1159 bytes
1159 bytes
I just compiled gdb 3.5 on an HP 9000 Series 330 running HP-UX 6.5 (we'll be running 7.0 soon). I used "config.gdb hp9k320" and compiled with HP's cc. It compiled just fine with no warnings but whenever I run it on a program, it says "<program> has no symbol-table; symbols discarded". I don't know anything about the differences between different HP hardware. Is there something inherently broken about the 330 so that gdb compiled with hp9k320 doesn't work properly w.r.t. symbol tables? If so, does anyone have diffs for gdb to run on the 330? We're all sick of using cdb here. In case it helps, the command "uname -a" returns this: HP-UX syseng7 6.5 A 9000/330 syseng7 Thanks, --Jim Dempsey-- jjd@bbn.com
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads