Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #1370Re: quality of GNU stuff vs. Sun OS stuff
From: swanger
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:28
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:28
36 lines
2757 bytes
2757 bytes
In article <PREECE.92Dec3171718@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>, preece@urbana.mcd.mot.com (Scott E. Preece) writes: > In article <f5#23s-@rpi.edu> night@acm.rpi.edu (Trip Martin) writes: > | Since the US now is a party to the Berne agreement, any document is > | implicitly copyrighted by the author, unless otherwise stated, rather > | than being implicitly public domain unless a copyright accompanies it > | (which is the way it used to be in the US). Incidentally, you own the > | copy of the document you have, but what exactly that means for email > | is pretty fuzzy. > --- > Even before we became a party to the Berne convention the question of > ownership of letters was well resolved. The author owns the right to > reproduce them, NOT the recipient (who only owns her own copy). This > has been upheld by quite a few court decisions. > > Don't quote unpublished letters without the author's permission; don't > quote published letters without the copyright holder's permission. Every once in a while, I'll post a question to some group (comp.lang.c, rec.travel, whatever). I'll sometimes get a request from someone via email, asking for a copy of all of the answers I received to my original question. In the past, I thought nothing of putting all of the replies I received in a file and mailing it out. My reasoning has been, I am a total stranger to most, if not all, of the people who helped me and I thought that since they didn't mind helping me, they wouldn't mind helping some other total stranger. Here is an example: Last year I attended the SUG conference in San Jose. A few months before the conference, I posted a request to rec.travel, asking for info on San Jose and San Fransisco. I received around 25 replies to my question. A few weeks later, a few people asked me to send them a copy of all of the replies I received. I thought there was no problem with this and did so. Now, am I to understand that this was an illegal/wrong/rude thing to do?? -- David Swanger, Auburn University, Alabama, swanger@accs.duc.auburn.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec15.082826.1@ducvax.auburn.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!news.larc.nasa.gov!darwin.sura.net!news.duc.auburn.edu!ducvax.auburn.edu!swangerReferences:
<009647B262C61D60.22200358@giant.IntraNet.com> <f5#23s-@rpi.edu> <PREECE.92Dec3171718@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!news.larc.nasa.gov!darwin.sura.net!news.duc.auburn.edu!ducvax.auburn.edu!swanger From: swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu Subject: Re: quality of GNU stuff vs. Sun OS stuff Message-ID: <1992Dec15.082826.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> Lines: 36 Sender: usenet@news.duc.auburn.edu (News Account) Nntp-Posting-Host: ducvax Organization: Auburn University, AL References: <009647B262C61D60.22200358@giant.IntraNet.com> <f5#23s-@rpi.edu> <PREECE.92Dec3171718@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com> Distribution: gnu Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:28:26 GMT Lines: 36