Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72047Re: The cost of SW patents
From: Jeffrey Kegler
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1992 00:18
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1992 00:18
45 lines
2809 bytes
2809 bytes
In article <703867994snx@crynwr.com> nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson) writes: >In article <36514@ogicse.ogi.edu> morgan@ogicse.cse.ogi.edu writes: > > > "If we don't file a patent for this product before it's introduced, > > then any number of companies could duplicate the product, file a > > patent application, and force us to pay royalties for our original > > work." > >Nope. They could publish a description of the patentable matter. I suspect the original statement was a bit of disinformation. They want to use the patent process but perhaps know how unpopular it is among hackers. Therefore they claim their motives are only defensive. My understanding (I am not a lawyer) is that if you simply wish to defend against patents, you clearly establish prior art, and this will invalidate any attempts to patent your invention. It's a lot cheaper, too. On this topic, in the last USENIX proceedings, there was a paper for a program to detect memory leaks. (I did not read it carefully, but it looked very brute force.) The program was patented. Since LPF and USENIX membership and interests overlap, would it be possible to have USENIX vote not to accept papers on patented software unless the technical merit of said software is clearly major? Otherwise USENIX is subsiding the advertizing budget of these outfits. USENIX would have more reason for this policy than shared goals with LPF. Contrary to USENIX's purpose of promulgating technical knowledge (and, for that matter, the original goals of patent law itself) firms that patent software usually enforce the maximum possible (or greater) legal secrecy on their creations. This makes it difficult for other investigators to learn from and to build on their work. Hence, what useful purpose for our trade the publishing of papers on such software in the USENIX proceeedings would have is not usually evident. That is to say, USENIX's academic interests and LPF's legal/political ones are congruent in this matter. -- Jeffrey Kegler, Independent UNIX Consultant, Algorists, Inc. jeffrey@algor2.ALGORISTS.COM or uunet!algor2!jeffrey 137 E Fremont AVE #122, Sunnyvale CA 94087
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr23.001851.10636@algor2.algorists.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!algor2.algorists.com!jeffreyReferences:
<36514@ogicse.ogi.edu> <703867994snx@crynwr.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,c49ad45ad13bf04b X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-04-22 17:18:51 PST Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!algor2.algorists.com!jeffrey From: jeffrey@algor2.algorists.com (Jeffrey Kegler) Subject: Re: The cost of SW patents Reply-To: jeffrey@algor2.algorists.com (Jeffrey Kegler) Organization: Algorists, Inc. Date: Thu, 23 Apr 92 00:18:51 GMT Message-ID: <1992Apr23.001851.10636@algor2.algorists.com> References: <36514@ogicse.ogi.edu> <703867994snx@crynwr.com> Lines: 45