Why HURD and not BSD?

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #72681

#72681

From: pgd
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1992 20:01

8 lines
822 bytes

HURD is adopted from MACH. BSD was considered but rejected. Why was
that? Now, in a year or so, we might see many source-level versions of
unix around.  

-- 
Per Lindqvist

Internet: pgd@compuram.bbt.se   Fidonet: Per Lindqvist @ 2:201/332

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Jan15.200129.2725@compuram.bbt.se>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sequent!talon!umn.edu!paperboy.micro.umn.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!fauern!unido!mcsun!news.funet.fi!sunic!seunet!kullmar!compuram!pgd

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,3fa7f2968a53caeb
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-18 07:22:35 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sequent!talon!umn.edu!paperboy.micro.umn.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!fauern!unido!mcsun!news.funet.fi!sunic!seunet!kullmar!compuram!pgd
From: pgd@compuram.bbt.se
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Why HURD and not BSD?
Message-ID: <1992Jan15.200129.2725@compuram.bbt.se>
Date: 15 Jan 92 20:01:29 GMT
Lines: 8