🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <MIB.92Jan14193341@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu> mib@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Michael I Bushnell) writes:
>which is well served by their respective licenses.  The problem is
>that when I buy a software prodect (say, Ultrix) I have no way of
>knowing that much (most?) of what I get can also be obtained from UCB
>at little or no cost.  DEC will offer to sell me a source tape, but

That can easily be remedied by one line in the copyright notice.

However in general I'd like to thank you for posting a very clear and
concise description of the goals and features of each approach.  
Hopefully this will make it more clear to those people who are
currently using GPL, but *don't* agree with the FSF goals for a
new world order, that they ought to be exploring other copyright options.
-- 
Alfalfa Software, Inc.          |       Poste:  The EMail for Unix
nazgul@alfalfa.com              |       Send Anything... Anywhere
617/497-2922                    |       info@alfalfa.com

I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.