Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72694Re: Too Good to be True?
From: en font terrible
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1992 13:03
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1992 13:03
23 lines
1645 bytes
1645 bytes
jbuck@forney.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck) writes: > MINIX isn't a contradiction to what I said; it's a confirmation! Because > of the licensing of MINIX, people couldn't do a little bit of work on > MINIX and sell the port to, say, the Amiga as if it were their own property > (as you can do with the "freed BSD sources", for example); their only real > alternative is to either just use the patches themselves or send them back > to the MINIX owner. This is nonsense. I've seen lots of patches to make MINIX work with unusual bits of hardware. And the MINIX Centre sells patches to improve MINIX and make it run on different systems. You can't sell MINIX itself as if it were yours, no. Because it isn't. But there's nothing to stop you selling improvements to MINIX. mathew -- Just another would-be Mac owner put off by Apple's monopolistic practices / If you know where I can buy the CD "In Mysterious Ways" by John Foxx, please send me email / Message for Kodak: Bring back Dan Bredy! / My PGP RSA public key is available on request / Desperately seeking CD of "U2" by Negativland / 4 lines
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1gJJeB15w164w@mantis.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathewReferences:
<kn487tINNlnn@agate.berkeley.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-14 13:13:05 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (en font terrible) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Too Good to be True? Message-ID: <1gJJeB15w164w@mantis.co.uk> Date: 14 Jan 92 13:03:47 GMT References: <kn487tINNlnn@agate.berkeley.edu> Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK. Lines: 23