Re: bison and LGPL

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #72695

#72695

From: Sean Eric Fagan
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1992 22:03

11 lines
1104 bytes

In article <9201131751.AA09847@wubios> david@wubios.wustl.edu (David J. Camp) writes:
>I suggest that the bison skeletons be changed to the LGPL instead of the GPL.

This isn't going to help, as it would require that the vendor distribute the
parser file (foo.y, that is) to satisfy the requirements.

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "One form to rule them all, one form to find them, one
sef@kithrup.COM  |  form to bring them all and in the darkness rewrite the
-----------------+  hell out of them" -- sendmail ruleset 3 comment from DEC.
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Jan14.220306.328@kithrup.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!kithrup!sef

References: <9201131751.AA09847@wubios>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,905baee0e11da392
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-14 14:40:36 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!kithrup!sef
From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Subject: Re: bison and LGPL
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Distribution: gnu
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1992 22:03:06 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Jan14.220306.328@kithrup.COM>
References: <9201131751.AA09847@wubios>

Reply to Parent Message