Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72717Re: Emacs vs. vi: # of users?
From: Linda Roise
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1992 20:59
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1992 20:59
13 lines
1586 bytes
1586 bytes
In article <FRIEDMAN.92Jan14174205@nutrimat.gnu.ai.mit.edu> friedman@nutrimat.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Noah Friedman) writes:
`ed' is the standard text editor. The man page (ed(1)) says so.
Yikes! I started to say, "It's not a text editor, it's a line
editor." But of course, it is both. I DID read the man page, though,
and find no reference to its being "the standard text editor." The
man pages may differ according to the flavor of Unix one is running.
My system is Umax (Encore Multimax).
--
__o
___________________________________________________ \<,
*<<_____ Linda Roise ___ roise@sumax.seattleu.edu ____>>* _____()/ ()___
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ROISE.92Jan15125924@sumax.seattleu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!henson!milton!sumax!roiseReferences:
<1992Jan13.232112.12150@mtholyoke.edu> <FRIEDMAN.92Jan14174205@nutrimat.gnu.ai.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ff485,459d66e7bfcdecc7 X-Google-Attributes: gidff485,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,70095a683cc8572a X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-15 13:16:39 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!henson!milton!sumax!roise From: roise@sumax.seattleu.edu (Linda Roise) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,alt.religion.emacs Subject: Re: Emacs vs. vi: # of users? Message-ID: <ROISE.92Jan15125924@sumax.seattleu.edu> Date: 15 Jan 92 20:59:24 GMT Article-I.D.: sumax.ROISE.92Jan15125924 References: <1992Jan13.232112.12150@mtholyoke.edu> <FRIEDMAN.92Jan14174205@nutrimat.gnu.ai.mit.edu> Sender: news@sumax.seattleu.edu Organization: Addiction Studies Program, Seattle University Lines: 13 In-reply-to: friedman@nutrimat.gnu.ai.mit.edu's message of 14 Jan 92 22:42:05 GMT