Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72718Re: Too Good to be True?
From: Ken Arromdee
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1992 21:02
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1992 21:02
40 lines
2755 bytes
2755 bytes
In article <62381@netnews.upenn.edu> yee@mipgsun.mipg.upenn.edu (Conway Yee) writes:
>Also remember, in most commercial licenses, you are not given the option
>of getting source. You can not modify what you don't have. In GPL, you
>are given the source. Thus, you have the option of making modifications.
>If you find offensive the fact that your changes must be redistributable,
>then don't make changes. In this respect the commercial license and the
>GPL is identical. In one you can not make changes (lack of source) in
>the other you will not (having your own code redistributable is offensive).
>What is the big deal?
This argument fails with respect to true public domain software.
>Let us take the possibility that you have a source license to a product
>(i.e. ATT UNIX). You are free to make improvements. Your code can
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>be under any license you choose.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If I modify GNU code, and decide to give it to someone, my modifications
_can't_ be under any license I choose; they must be under the GNU license.
>Remember, however, that in order to
>be useful to anyone, a person using your code must have access to
>UNIX source (if he doesn't, then you didn't need the source either. An
>example is someone who writes a spreadsheet). Thus, a prerequisite for
>your licensee is a UNIX source license. Thus, effectively ATT propagates
>their license. Is this any different from GPL?
Yes. The AT&T "propagation" only spreads to AT&T code. If I had code of my
own, added it to AT&T source, and gave it to someone else who also had a source
license, that person could cut out my added code and use it for whatever he
wishes without propagating the AT&T license. If I did the same to GNU source,
the license would be propagated.
--
"In the end, one or the other will triumph--a funeral dirge will be sung over
the Soviet republic or over world capitalism."
-- V.I. Lenin, 1920
Kenneth Arromdee (UUCP: ....!jhunix!arromdee; BITNET: arromdee@jhuvm;
INTERNET: arromdee@cs.jhu.edu)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jan15.210242.3076@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!blaze.cs.jhu.edu!arromdeeReferences:
<3029@tronsbox.xei.com> <NELSON.92Jan15003606@cheetah.clarkson.edu> <62381@netnews.upenn.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-15 13:17:00 PST Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!blaze.cs.jhu.edu!arromdee From: arromdee@blaze.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) Subject: Re: Too Good to be True? Message-ID: <1992Jan15.210242.3076@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> Organization: Johns Hopkins University CS Dept. References: <3029@tronsbox.xei.com> <NELSON.92Jan15003606@cheetah.clarkson.edu> <62381@netnews.upenn.edu> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1992 21:02:42 GMT Lines: 40