Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74253Re: c++ vs ada results
From: Steve Savitzky
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1991 00:55
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1991 00:55
37 lines
2865 bytes
2865 bytes
In article <1991Jun18.042950.4473@netcom.COM> jls@netcom.COM (Jim Showalter) writes: Sorry. I retract my statement that when it comes to compilers you get what you pay for, at least as it concerns the particular case of GNU. I've received nothing but praise (usually stated quite angrily) via e-mail for the GNU family. I find this, by the way, to be totally bizarre, since it seemingly flies in the face of 6,000 years of free-market economic theory. Why something free would be quite bug free and would have great support in contrast to something that costs money is completely beyond me--were this true in general one would expect cheap cars to be better than expensive ones, and free cars to be best of all. Anybody care to enlighten me? Well, it has something to do with the fact that *anyone* can fix bugs in the GNU software, because they have it in source form. In terms of economic theory, you would expect the product with the largest number of qualified support engineers to have the best support, and GNU automatically has that because anyone who feels qualified can support it. Another way of looking at this in traditional economic theory is that, other things being equal, the product with the largest number of customers will have the best support. Since number of customers varies inversely with price and the price of GNU is zero, ... You can have a high-quality product with zero price in the software world because the cost to manufacture is also zero. Development and support costs are distributed over the large subset of users who take the time to improve the program and share their improvements with the rest. Perhaps somebody can think of a non-software example of this phenomenon. -- \ --Steve Savitzky-- \ ADVANsoft Research Corp \ FREE CYBERIA! \ \ steve@advansoft.COM \ 4301 Great America Pkwy \ Committee for a Free and \ \ arc!steve@apple.COM \ Santa Clara, CA 95954 \ Independent Cyberspace \ \__ steve@arc.UUCP _________408-727-3357___________________________________
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<STEVE.91Jun18175519@diana.Advansoft.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!olivea!oliveb!veritas!amdcad!arc!arc!steveReferences:
<1991Jun12.164741.412@news.larc.nasa.gov> <1991Jun12.201740.16463@netcom.COM> <NELSON.91Jun15224835@sun.clarkson.edu> <1991Jun18.042950.4473@netcom.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e54364a0ce166454 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-06-19 12:31:41 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!olivea!oliveb!veritas!amdcad!arc!arc!steve From: steve@Advansoft.COM (Steve Savitzky) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: c++ vs ada results Message-ID: <STEVE.91Jun18175519@diana.Advansoft.COM> Date: 19 Jun 91 00:55:19 GMT References: <1991Jun12.164741.412@news.larc.nasa.gov> <1991Jun12.201740.16463@netcom.COM> <NELSON.91Jun15224835@sun.clarkson.edu> <1991Jun18.042950.4473@netcom.COM> Sender: @advansoft.com Organization: Advansoft Research Corp, Santa Clara, CA Lines: 32 In-Reply-To: jls@netcom.COM's message of 18 Jun 91 04:29:50 GMT