🚀 go-pugleaf

hahahaha thank you :-D

"Daril" <daril73%NOSPAM%@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:Xns9765F0D8D30Bdaril73NOSPAMgmailco@198.164.200.20...
> RUSiriusA <gdeppe@eastlink.ca> wrote in news:gdeppe-1B662A.19421609022006
> @news.telus.net:
>
>> All the whales are rare and intelligent behemuths that deserve as much
>> respect as ones own dying pet dog.
>>
>> 1,000 whales a year are culled for aphrodesiac and other yummy things.
>>
>> Bluewater foods make deal with Mitssui corporation in Japan... whom go
>> on whale hunt in Pacific.
>>
>> Bird of Paradise discovered in New Guinea = 2006
>>
>> Bird of Paradise gone extinct = 2006
>>
>>
>> G.
>>
>
> It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will
> undeniably be considered perfidious by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it
> must be stated that few people realize that the word
> "indistinguishability" is so compromised that I retain it only as a
> pejorative. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting
> some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of
> view or vice versa, I intend to argue that when I hear BlueWater Seafood
> say that everyone and everything discriminates against it -- including
> the writing on the bathroom stalls -- I have to wonder about it. Is it
> entirely feckless? Is it simply being shameless? Or is it merely
> embracing a delusion in which it must believe in order to continue
> believing in itself? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let
> me take a stab at it: BlueWater Seafood claims to have turned over a new
> leaf shortly after getting caught trying to etiolate its enemies. This
> claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by BlueWater
> Seafood's supporters. The truth is that we need to look beyond the most
> immediate and visible problems with BlueWater Seafood. We need to look at
> what is behind these problems and understand that I am not trying to save
> the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to
> subject BlueWater Seafood's ideologies to the rigorous scrutiny they
> warrant. BlueWater Seafood has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice
> with vengeful, cold-blooded backbiters. Is this because it needs their
> help to make our lives a living hell? One might as well ask, "When it
> looks in the mirror in the morning, does BlueWater Seafood see more than
> the same, mephitic face that all disreputable pissants share?" We already
> have our answer; as a respected journalist put it, "I demand an apology
> from BlueWater Seafood for its insults". He probably could have added
> that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less malignant
> than BlueWater Seafood. I just want to say that there is a format
> BlueWater Seafood should follow for its next literary endeavor. It
> involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.
>
> Although discourteous rabble-rousers are relatively small in number
> compared to the general population, they are rapidly increasing in size
> and fervor. BlueWater Seafood's memoirs symbolize lawlessness, violence,
> and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of
> us lose more than a little freedom. BlueWater Seafood writes a lot of
> long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that it
> constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to its
> readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that
> BlueWater Seafood files one grievance after another. And that's why I'm
> writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to stop
> its encroachments on our heritage. There's no way I can do that alone,
> and there's no way I can do it without first stating that its allies
> claim to have no choice but to keep a close eye on those who look like
> they might think an unapproved thought. I wish there were some way to
> help these miserable, cheeky, ethically bankrupt bottom-feeders. They are
> outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. There
> can be no doubt that it's unequivocally astounding that BlueWater Seafood
> has found a way to work the words "semiprofessionalized" and
> "photodisintegration" into its philosophies. However, you may find it
> even more astounding that its lapdogs get a thrill out of protesting.
> They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them,
> going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with
> BlueWater Seafood, and meeting some other reprehensible BlueWater Seafood
> clones is merely a social event. They're not even aware that if BlueWater
> Seafood had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that it is
> the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a
> wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to its lamentations.
> Everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of
> BlueWater Seafood". In it, I chronicle all of BlueWater Seafood's
> objectives, from the moonstruck to the disgraceful, and conclude that if
> I were a complete sap, I'd believe BlueWater Seafood's line that mingy
> scum aren't ever snooty. Unfortunately for it, I realize that if
> BlueWater Seafood wants to be taken seriously, it should counter the
> arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal
> anecdotes, or insults. Yes, I realize that BlueWater Seafood and its
> deputies are puppets of ghastly sociopaths, but for the sake of brevity
> I've had to express myself in simplified terms.
>
> BlueWater Seafood should clarify its point so people like you and me can
> tell what the heck it's talking about. Without clarification, BlueWater
> Seafood's recommendations sound lofty and include some emotionally
> charged words but don't really seem to make any sense. Lest I seem like a
> hypocrite, I should tell you that there may be nothing we can do to
> prevent BlueWater Seafood from making good on its word to judge people
> based solely on hearsay. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to
> the comforting picture purveyed by its secret agents, we experience
> psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to
> review the basic issues at the root of the debate. Did it ever occur to
> BlueWater Seafood that maybe it has an almost mystical faith in Maoism?
> Dream on. BlueWater Seafood's plans for the future are as predictable as
> sunrise. Whenever I convince drossy oppressive-types to stop supporting
> BlueWater Seafood and tolerating its nostrums, its invariant response is
> to provide the pretext for police-state measures.
>
> BlueWater Seafood thinks that it is beyond reproach. Of course, thinking
> so doesn't make it so. BlueWater Seafood's reasoning is circular and
> therefore invalid. In other words, it always begins an argument with its
> conclusion (e.g., that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that
> it can dole out or retract) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- it
> always arrives at that very conclusion.
>
> BlueWater Seafood's hallucinations about the benefits of sensationalism
> are so deep and inveterate that they can be broken, if at all, only if we
> guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. That
> concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that BlueWater
> Seafood's devotees are unified under a common goal. That goal is to leave
> a generation of people planted in the mud of a selfish world, to begin a
> new life in the shadows of boosterism. BlueWater Seafood must think that
> being prodigal entitles one to create a new cottage industry around
> BlueWater Seafood's inerudite form of neopaganism. The main dissensus
> between me and BlueWater Seafood is that I maintain that some day,
> BlueWater Seafood will indulge in a vast orgy of murder to sate its
> innate blood-lust and its hatred of its betters. It, on the other hand,
> contends that at birth, every living being is assigned a celestial serial
> number or frequency power spectrum.
>
> BlueWater Seafood's historical record of otiose, sexist ebullitions is
> clearer than the muddled pronouncements of its hangers-on, but that's
> really beside the point. At the same time, BlueWater Seafood likes
> thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why
> it just keeps on saying, "We don't give a [expletive deleted] about you.
> We just want to leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated
> and disillusioned."
>
> Statements like, "Querulous, temperamental deadbeats are burdened with
> the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which
> they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically"
> accurately express the feelings of most of us here. In case you don't
> know, most people don't realize that BlueWater Seafood has already
> revealed its plans to wage a clandestine guerilla war against many basic
> human rights. It revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the
> hallmarks of having been written by a foul-mouthed meany. Not only is its
> manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and
> absolutely anecdotal, but BlueWater Seafood likes to quote all of the
> saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of
> Marxism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, it invariably instructs
> its companions to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination.
> Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning.
> Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual,
> it makes perfect sense in light of BlueWater Seafood's flagitious, self-
> serving effusions. Speaking of which, BlueWater Seafood occasionally
> writes letters accusing me and my friends of being politically incorrect
> loons. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is
> doubtless the language in which BlueWater Seafood habitually thinks) and
> serve no purpose other than to convince me that if my memory serves me
> correctly, it thinks we want it to pilfer the national treasure. Excuse
> me, but maybe it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. It
> distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its
> current opinions. Let me quote to you from the words of my attorney:
> "BlueWater Seafood's propaganda machine grinds on and on." I want nothing
> more -- or less -- than to build a true community of spirit and purpose
> based on mutual respect and caring. To that task I have consecrated my
> life, and I invite you to do likewise.
>
> BlueWater Seafood has endorsed the idea of soulless cynicism in a number
> of very specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of its satraps'
> decision to exercise control through indirect coercion or through
> psychological pressure or manipulation. Believe it or not, I really want
> to believe that BlueWater Seafood is a decent, honest organization.
> Unfortunately, as is often the case, what I want to believe proves to be
> fantasy. The truth is that BlueWater Seafood commonly appoints
> ineffective people to important positions. It then ensures that these
> people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for BlueWater
> Seafood to trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful.
> If history follows its course, it should be evident that BlueWater
> Seafood wants me to stop trying to focus on what unites rather than
> divides us. Instead, it'd rather I drop to my knees and beg for mercy.
> Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily. Mark my words: BlueWater
> Seafood coins polysyllabic neologisms to make its slurs sound like
> they're actually important. In fact, its treatises are filled to the brim
> with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.
>
> According to BlueWater Seafood, skin color means more than skill and
> gender is more impressive than genius. It might as well be reading tea
> leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's
> true and what isn't. Maybe then BlueWater Seafood would realize that it
> has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why
> I feel obligated to inform you that there is a proper place in life for
> hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool.
> But when BlueWater Seafood perverts hatred in order to offer stones
> instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world, it
> becomes clear that it claims that coercion in the name of liberty is a
> valid use of state power. Well, I beg to differ. At the risk of sounding
> hopelessly obtuse, BlueWater Seafood wants to tell us how to live, what
> to say, what to think, what to know, and -- most importantly -- what not
> to know. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.
> If you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim
> of your own ignorance. I can't follow BlueWater Seafood's pretzel logic.
> I do, however, know that its offhand remarks are a logical absurdity, a
> series of deductions from a premise that has been denied. Speaking of
> absurdities, when BlueWater Seafood tells us that unfounded attacks on
> character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best
> way to make a point, it somehow fails to mention that the more we give
> it, the more it wants. It fails to mention that unless it provides
> unequivocal evidence to the contrary, I will continue to believe that I
> would be surprised if BlueWater Seafood stopped to communicate and share
> ideas with even one of the people it regularly attacks. And it fails to
> mention that when you tell BlueWater Seafood's cat's-paws that it is
> widely known and beyond dispute that BlueWater Seafood is a master of
> psychological manipulation, they begin to get fidgety, and their eyes
> begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing
> that my general thesis is that it keeps telling us that it is as innocent
> as a newborn lamb. Are we also supposed to believe that all literature
> which opposes antagonism was forged by hostile clumsy-types? I didn't
> think so. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish
> my general thesis: What we have been imparting to BlueWater Seafood -- or
> what it has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely
> intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to
> acknowledge. The devil not only finds too much mischief for idle hands to
> do, but increasingly in our contemporary world, he causes what I call
> batty psychics to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a
> vital community.
>
> Our national media is controlled by the most acrimonious miscreants I've
> ever seen. That's why you probably haven't heard that there are two
> related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent BlueWater
> Seafood has tried to revive the ruinous excess of a bygone era to bounce
> and blow amidst the ruinous excess of the present era. The other is
> whether or not BlueWater Seafood is reluctant to resolve problems. It
> always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that of all
> of its exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands
> out: "BlueWater Seafood is the one who will lead us to our great shining
> future." I don't know where it came up with this, but its statement is
> dead wrong. The law of parsimony suggests that BlueWater Seafood accepts
> -- or, at least, feels obligated to pretend to accept -- the ideological
> premises of diabolism. To cap that off, ignorance is bliss. This may be
> why BlueWater Seafood's apparatchiks are generally all smiles. In a
> previous letter, I announced my intention to expose BlueWater Seafood's
> prevarications for what they really are. Naturally, this announcement
> caused BlueWater Seafood to mutter abuses befitting its character.
> Incidents like that truly demonstrate how it has delivered exactly the
> opposite of what it had previously promised us. Most notably, BlueWater
> Seafood's vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and
> domination. And, almost as troubling, its vows of equality did little
> more than convince people that it wants to engage in an endless round of
> finger pointing. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is BlueWater
> Seafood's gossamer grasp of reality. One last thing: BlueWater Seafood's
> insults are surrounded by a halo of phallocentrism.
>
> Andy