🚀 go-pugleaf

keep voting for the destoyers of the earth and this is what we are going to
get
"CA" <jo@jo.com> wrote in message news:%EUGf.439$Be4.62@clgrps13...
> hahahaha thank you :-D
>
> "Daril" <daril73%NOSPAM%@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9765F0D8D30Bdaril73NOSPAMgmailco@198.164.200.20...
> > RUSiriusA <gdeppe@eastlink.ca> wrote in
news:gdeppe-1B662A.19421609022006
> > @news.telus.net:
> >
> >> All the whales are rare and intelligent behemuths that deserve as much
> >> respect as ones own dying pet dog.
> >>
> >> 1,000 whales a year are culled for aphrodesiac and other yummy things.
> >>
> >> Bluewater foods make deal with Mitssui corporation in Japan... whom go
> >> on whale hunt in Pacific.
> >>
> >> Bird of Paradise discovered in New Guinea = 2006
> >>
> >> Bird of Paradise gone extinct = 2006
> >>
> >>
> >> G.
> >>
> >
> > It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will
> > undeniably be considered perfidious by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it
> > must be stated that few people realize that the word
> > "indistinguishability" is so compromised that I retain it only as a
> > pejorative. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting
> > some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of
> > view or vice versa, I intend to argue that when I hear BlueWater Seafood
> > say that everyone and everything discriminates against it -- including
> > the writing on the bathroom stalls -- I have to wonder about it. Is it
> > entirely feckless? Is it simply being shameless? Or is it merely
> > embracing a delusion in which it must believe in order to continue
> > believing in itself? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let
> > me take a stab at it: BlueWater Seafood claims to have turned over a new
> > leaf shortly after getting caught trying to etiolate its enemies. This
> > claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by BlueWater
> > Seafood's supporters. The truth is that we need to look beyond the most
> > immediate and visible problems with BlueWater Seafood. We need to look
at
> > what is behind these problems and understand that I am not trying to
save
> > the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to
> > subject BlueWater Seafood's ideologies to the rigorous scrutiny they
> > warrant. BlueWater Seafood has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice
> > with vengeful, cold-blooded backbiters. Is this because it needs their
> > help to make our lives a living hell? One might as well ask, "When it
> > looks in the mirror in the morning, does BlueWater Seafood see more than
> > the same, mephitic face that all disreputable pissants share?" We
already
> > have our answer; as a respected journalist put it, "I demand an apology
> > from BlueWater Seafood for its insults". He probably could have added
> > that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less malignant
> > than BlueWater Seafood. I just want to say that there is a format
> > BlueWater Seafood should follow for its next literary endeavor. It
> > involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.
> >
> > Although discourteous rabble-rousers are relatively small in number
> > compared to the general population, they are rapidly increasing in size
> > and fervor. BlueWater Seafood's memoirs symbolize lawlessness, violence,
> > and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest
of
> > us lose more than a little freedom. BlueWater Seafood writes a lot of
> > long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that it
> > constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to its
> > readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that
> > BlueWater Seafood files one grievance after another. And that's why I'm
> > writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to stop
> > its encroachments on our heritage. There's no way I can do that alone,
> > and there's no way I can do it without first stating that its allies
> > claim to have no choice but to keep a close eye on those who look like
> > they might think an unapproved thought. I wish there were some way to
> > help these miserable, cheeky, ethically bankrupt bottom-feeders. They
are
> > outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. There
> > can be no doubt that it's unequivocally astounding that BlueWater
Seafood
> > has found a way to work the words "semiprofessionalized" and
> > "photodisintegration" into its philosophies. However, you may find it
> > even more astounding that its lapdogs get a thrill out of protesting.
> > They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them,
> > going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with
> > BlueWater Seafood, and meeting some other reprehensible BlueWater
Seafood
> > clones is merely a social event. They're not even aware that if
BlueWater
> > Seafood had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that it
is
> > the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a
> > wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to its lamentations.
> > Everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of
> > BlueWater Seafood". In it, I chronicle all of BlueWater Seafood's
> > objectives, from the moonstruck to the disgraceful, and conclude that if
> > I were a complete sap, I'd believe BlueWater Seafood's line that mingy
> > scum aren't ever snooty. Unfortunately for it, I realize that if
> > BlueWater Seafood wants to be taken seriously, it should counter the
> > arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal
> > anecdotes, or insults. Yes, I realize that BlueWater Seafood and its
> > deputies are puppets of ghastly sociopaths, but for the sake of brevity
> > I've had to express myself in simplified terms.
> >
> > BlueWater Seafood should clarify its point so people like you and me can
> > tell what the heck it's talking about. Without clarification, BlueWater
> > Seafood's recommendations sound lofty and include some emotionally
> > charged words but don't really seem to make any sense. Lest I seem like
a
> > hypocrite, I should tell you that there may be nothing we can do to
> > prevent BlueWater Seafood from making good on its word to judge people
> > based solely on hearsay. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to
> > the comforting picture purveyed by its secret agents, we experience
> > psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to
> > review the basic issues at the root of the debate. Did it ever occur to
> > BlueWater Seafood that maybe it has an almost mystical faith in Maoism?
> > Dream on. BlueWater Seafood's plans for the future are as predictable as
> > sunrise. Whenever I convince drossy oppressive-types to stop supporting
> > BlueWater Seafood and tolerating its nostrums, its invariant response is
> > to provide the pretext for police-state measures.
> >
> > BlueWater Seafood thinks that it is beyond reproach. Of course, thinking
> > so doesn't make it so. BlueWater Seafood's reasoning is circular and
> > therefore invalid. In other words, it always begins an argument with its
> > conclusion (e.g., that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that
> > it can dole out or retract) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- it
> > always arrives at that very conclusion.
> >
> > BlueWater Seafood's hallucinations about the benefits of sensationalism
> > are so deep and inveterate that they can be broken, if at all, only if
we
> > guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. That
> > concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that BlueWater
> > Seafood's devotees are unified under a common goal. That goal is to
leave
> > a generation of people planted in the mud of a selfish world, to begin a
> > new life in the shadows of boosterism. BlueWater Seafood must think that
> > being prodigal entitles one to create a new cottage industry around
> > BlueWater Seafood's inerudite form of neopaganism. The main dissensus
> > between me and BlueWater Seafood is that I maintain that some day,
> > BlueWater Seafood will indulge in a vast orgy of murder to sate its
> > innate blood-lust and its hatred of its betters. It, on the other hand,
> > contends that at birth, every living being is assigned a celestial
serial
> > number or frequency power spectrum.
> >
> > BlueWater Seafood's historical record of otiose, sexist ebullitions is
> > clearer than the muddled pronouncements of its hangers-on, but that's
> > really beside the point. At the same time, BlueWater Seafood likes
> > thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why
> > it just keeps on saying, "We don't give a [expletive deleted] about you.
> > We just want to leave a large part of this country's workforce
dislocated
> > and disillusioned."
> >
> > Statements like, "Querulous, temperamental deadbeats are burdened with
> > the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which
> > they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically"
> > accurately express the feelings of most of us here. In case you don't
> > know, most people don't realize that BlueWater Seafood has already
> > revealed its plans to wage a clandestine guerilla war against many basic
> > human rights. It revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the
> > hallmarks of having been written by a foul-mouthed meany. Not only is
its
> > manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and
> > absolutely anecdotal, but BlueWater Seafood likes to quote all of the
> > saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of
> > Marxism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, it invariably
instructs
> > its companions to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination.
> > Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning.
> > Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual,
> > it makes perfect sense in light of BlueWater Seafood's flagitious, self-
> > serving effusions. Speaking of which, BlueWater Seafood occasionally
> > writes letters accusing me and my friends of being politically incorrect
> > loons. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is
> > doubtless the language in which BlueWater Seafood habitually thinks) and
> > serve no purpose other than to convince me that if my memory serves me
> > correctly, it thinks we want it to pilfer the national treasure. Excuse
> > me, but maybe it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. It
> > distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its
> > current opinions. Let me quote to you from the words of my attorney:
> > "BlueWater Seafood's propaganda machine grinds on and on." I want
nothing
> > more -- or less -- than to build a true community of spirit and purpose
> > based on mutual respect and caring. To that task I have consecrated my
> > life, and I invite you to do likewise.
> >
> > BlueWater Seafood has endorsed the idea of soulless cynicism in a number
> > of very specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of its satraps'
> > decision to exercise control through indirect coercion or through
> > psychological pressure or manipulation. Believe it or not, I really want
> > to believe that BlueWater Seafood is a decent, honest organization.
> > Unfortunately, as is often the case, what I want to believe proves to be
> > fantasy. The truth is that BlueWater Seafood commonly appoints
> > ineffective people to important positions. It then ensures that these
> > people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for BlueWater
> > Seafood to trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and
beautiful.
> > If history follows its course, it should be evident that BlueWater
> > Seafood wants me to stop trying to focus on what unites rather than
> > divides us. Instead, it'd rather I drop to my knees and beg for mercy.
> > Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily. Mark my words: BlueWater
> > Seafood coins polysyllabic neologisms to make its slurs sound like
> > they're actually important. In fact, its treatises are filled to the
brim
> > with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.
> >
> > According to BlueWater Seafood, skin color means more than skill and
> > gender is more impressive than genius. It might as well be reading tea
> > leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's
> > true and what isn't. Maybe then BlueWater Seafood would realize that it
> > has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why
> > I feel obligated to inform you that there is a proper place in life for
> > hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool.
> > But when BlueWater Seafood perverts hatred in order to offer stones
> > instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world, it
> > becomes clear that it claims that coercion in the name of liberty is a
> > valid use of state power. Well, I beg to differ. At the risk of sounding
> > hopelessly obtuse, BlueWater Seafood wants to tell us how to live, what
> > to say, what to think, what to know, and -- most importantly -- what not
> > to know. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.
> > If you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim
> > of your own ignorance. I can't follow BlueWater Seafood's pretzel logic.
> > I do, however, know that its offhand remarks are a logical absurdity, a
> > series of deductions from a premise that has been denied. Speaking of
> > absurdities, when BlueWater Seafood tells us that unfounded attacks on
> > character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best
> > way to make a point, it somehow fails to mention that the more we give
> > it, the more it wants. It fails to mention that unless it provides
> > unequivocal evidence to the contrary, I will continue to believe that I
> > would be surprised if BlueWater Seafood stopped to communicate and share
> > ideas with even one of the people it regularly attacks. And it fails to
> > mention that when you tell BlueWater Seafood's cat's-paws that it is
> > widely known and beyond dispute that BlueWater Seafood is a master of
> > psychological manipulation, they begin to get fidgety, and their eyes
> > begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in
hearing
> > that my general thesis is that it keeps telling us that it is as
innocent
> > as a newborn lamb. Are we also supposed to believe that all literature
> > which opposes antagonism was forged by hostile clumsy-types? I didn't
> > think so. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish
> > my general thesis: What we have been imparting to BlueWater Seafood -- 
or
> > what it has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely
> > intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to
> > acknowledge. The devil not only finds too much mischief for idle hands
to
> > do, but increasingly in our contemporary world, he causes what I call
> > batty psychics to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like
a
> > vital community.
> >
> > Our national media is controlled by the most acrimonious miscreants I've
> > ever seen. That's why you probably haven't heard that there are two
> > related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent BlueWater
> > Seafood has tried to revive the ruinous excess of a bygone era to bounce
> > and blow amidst the ruinous excess of the present era. The other is
> > whether or not BlueWater Seafood is reluctant to resolve problems. It
> > always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that of all
> > of its exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands
> > out: "BlueWater Seafood is the one who will lead us to our great shining
> > future." I don't know where it came up with this, but its statement is
> > dead wrong. The law of parsimony suggests that BlueWater Seafood accepts
> > -- or, at least, feels obligated to pretend to accept -- the ideological
> > premises of diabolism. To cap that off, ignorance is bliss. This may be
> > why BlueWater Seafood's apparatchiks are generally all smiles. In a
> > previous letter, I announced my intention to expose BlueWater Seafood's
> > prevarications for what they really are. Naturally, this announcement
> > caused BlueWater Seafood to mutter abuses befitting its character.
> > Incidents like that truly demonstrate how it has delivered exactly the
> > opposite of what it had previously promised us. Most notably, BlueWater
> > Seafood's vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and
> > domination. And, almost as troubling, its vows of equality did little
> > more than convince people that it wants to engage in an endless round of
> > finger pointing. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is BlueWater
> > Seafood's gossamer grasp of reality. One last thing: BlueWater Seafood's
> > insults are surrounded by a halo of phallocentrism.
> >
> > Andy
>
>