🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 20:50:16 -0500, john[the_truth]l wrote:

If you are so concerned about human life, why don't you list here some of
the good works you have recently done like bringing food to the poor, or
helping those in need.  To me that would be a more Christian ideal than
sitting behind a computer screen trying to control the potential life, be
it terrible or good, of an unborn child.

You want the truth?  Chances are you a loser, who takes no action about
anything.  Chances are you do not lift a finger to help anyone, and are
the first one at a store sale to steal it away from someone else.  In
my experience, the more people think they know, the more the demonstrate
how little they have lived.

Personally, I can't get pregnant, cause I am a man, so what the hell do I
know about being a woman and getting pregnant.  If a women goes to a Doctor, and God
where ever he is, decides they have both committed a sin, then let him
send them to hell, where ever that is.  If god gives me the opportunity
to council someone, I will express my opinion as I see it, if asked.  If
one believes in God, then they should also believe that he is powerful
enough to create an opportunity for his view to be known, and for a person
to either cross or not cross those lines, for without free choice, there
would not be sinners, or lack thereof.

So, I am pro-choice, because everyone should be given the choice to make
their decision, be it good or bad, if it does not override the rights of
another in society, such as in murder.

So therefore, the question is, do unborn children have rights.  I would
say that we cannot let unborn children have rights, because I never want
to give the Government the power to eradicate closed minded
unsympathetic people such as pro lifers from the gene pool, even if such was technically
possible.

Although I would love to have a world without some pathetic people
like pro lifers, and I am shamed to say that my father is a pro lifer, and
even he admits as a minister that I have my point, I must support their
parents exclusive inherent right to
have or not have their children, free of any interruption, be it from you,
society or the government.  This means that even
people like you, will always be born and be given a chance to enforce your
ideas on others.

So you take your truth, and get your coat on and go give some help to the
poor destitute children on the street, who's druggie or Alcoholic mother was
forced to have because one time, people like you had their way.  Then I
might, say, yeah this John the truth guy, he is actually worth something
to society.  Other than that, I would prefer never to see your words in
type again, cause your opinions are bull shit, and not well thought out,
and nothing more than hate mongering against the under priviledged in
society.

SO


> Donna Whitman wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:13:35 -0500, "john[the_truth]l"
>> <"john[the_truth]l"@tcn.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Henry Morgentaler's abortuary in Halifax closed yesterday to the
>> 
>> 
>>     The clinic closed because the procedure can now be done in a
>> hospital like any other operation. 
> 
> ...and what other operation is performed to kill a child?
> 
> 
>> The clinic is no longer needed because women have free choice. 
> 
> ...wasn't that your argument for wanting the baby-killing mill 
> in the first place?
> 
> 
>> Whether it's a choice I would take or
>> not, I'm glad that it's freely available. 
> 
> ...well sure you are, what do you care if other women slaughter 
> their child in the womb or not, abortion is just another form of 
> birth control anyways, right? If condoms, spermacide, or the 
> pill didn't stop the child from being conceived and spoiling 
> your sex life, murdering the unwanted little bugger after 
> conception is always an available 'choice', right?
> 
> 
> ...and the article said...
> 
> While Morgentaler's staff now claim the closing is due to 
> abortion being available at the local Victoria General hospital, 
> the hospital was already doing abortions in 1999 when 
> Morgentaler admitted that his Nova Scotia operations were not 
> turning a profit.