🚀 go-pugleaf

Kent Wills wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:42:56 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
> 
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:44:55 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:06:37 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:42:56 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:59:02 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 	Huh? I don't even see anything even remotely Bob related here.
>>>>>>>>>>> Odd that you seem to.
>>>>>>>>>> Odd that Bob lives in Az. and YOU are now posting here, instead of your 
>>>>>>>>>> usual gig in AFBL.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 	Odd that I'm reading and posting from ia.talk.misc.  I don't
>>>>>>>>> check AFBL all that much anymore.  Once a week is the norm, unless
>>>>>>>>> something exciting catches me.
>>>>>>>> Odd that so MANY of your posts are there:
>>>>>>> 	Odd that you dishonestly failed to mention that the bulk were
>>>>>>> cross posts from misc.legal.  In fact, when one clicks on my name, one
>>>>>>> finds only ONE post that wasn't made from misc.legal in the first
>>>>>>> list. 
>>>>>> I don;t care how many OTHER groups were on the x-post list, you were 
>>>>>> primarily posting about BOB!
>>>>>>
>>>>> 	Not so.  The Trusted Bible thread has had no mention of
>>>>> Lar$on.  Same with the multiple Cameron Brown threads.
>>>> Kent, you have been BUSTED!
>>>>
>>> 	Not in the eyes of any sane person.
>> In the archives of google, LOL!
>>
> 
> 	And most of those who visit Google are sane, so most wouldn't
> see it as you do.

Sorry kent, the facts stand as posted.

>>>> You ARE and have BEEN an AFBL mainstay!
>>>>
>>> 	I'm a bit of a regular.  I try to visit once a week.  More if
>>> something exciting is going on.
>>> 	The simple truth is, you post there far more than I do.
>> Nope.
> 
> 	Yep.  Not counting cross-posts, you post there more often than
> I.  

Nope, another lie.

> 
>>>>>>> 	The next most recent AFBL post listed is for Feb. 4.
>>>>>>> 	Now quite what one would expect for an obsessed person.
>>>>>> Squirm worm, it's your record on display:
>>>>> 	And those who wish to do so can see for themselves that very
>>>>> few posts are about Lar$on.  He's not the issue he once was.
>>>> Obssessor tries to squirm out.
>>> 	You are?
>> YOU ARE, YOU SICK OCD BOB FREAK.
> 
> 	Where did you get your degree in Psychology?

I wouldn't need one to observe your fixation on Bob...

> If you are
> depending upon the tentative diagnosis of another, from which
> University did he or she get his or her degree?
> 
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/about?hl=en
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This month's top posters
>>>>>>>> 65 	  	for...@it.com
>>>>>>>> 63 	  	compu...@gmail.com (kent)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All time top posters
>>>>>>>> 7597 	  	jacob...@pacbell.net
>>>>>>>> 5505 	  	Range...@concentric.net
>>>>>>>> 5109 	  	j...@thecodezone.com
>>>>>>>> 2895 	  	compu...@gmail.com (kent)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> your opinions have proven to be little more 
>>>>>>>>>>>> than revisionist slime from the get go.
>>>>>>>>>>> 	I post the truth.  You don't have to like it, but you do have
>>>>>>>>>>> to accept it.
>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't know the truth if it walked up and bit you in the ass.
>>>>>>>>> 	Projection transference noted.
>>>>>>>> Psychobabble bullshit noted.
>>>>>>> 	It's called truth.  
>>>>>> You have none to offer, never do.
>>>>> 	Projection is a bad thing, Sam.
>>>> So why do you?
>>> 	Please provide just one instance, 
>> You're doing it now.
> 
> 	Transference is also a bad thing, Sam.

Do tell, well work on your projection first, ok?

>>>>>>>>>>> 	And what do you have against LEGAL immigration?
>>>>>>>>>> Nothing at all.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 	You must,
>>>>>>>> You lie again, as per always.
>>>>>>> 	You took a contrary position to Just Cocky, and his position
>>>>>>> has consistently been PRO legal immigration.
>>>>>> Mine is not against it either.
>>>>> 	Then explain why you took a contrary position to Just Cocky.
>>>>> It doesn't make any sense.
>>>> Then quote where I did, assfuck.
>>>>
>>> 	Are you claiming you haven't done so?  Are you in agreement
>> with Just Cocky?  If so, I misunderstood your posts, and apologize.
>>
>> Are you proving?
>>
>> No...looks like you're not, fuck off child.
> 
> 	I asked a question.  Why can't you offer a simple and direct
> answer?

Cite your proof or fuck off.

>>>>>>>>> since you have taken a position contrary to Just
>>>>>>>>> Cocky and me.  We are very much PRO legal immigration.
>>>>>>>> Of course you are, it's how YOU got here isn't it?
>>>>>>> 	It's how *I* got here.  I don't know the circumstances of Just
>>>>>>> Cocky.  He may have been born in the U.S.
>>>>>> And we need more responsive quotas and standards - that's my position.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What say you?
>>>>> 	I say it's far too difficult as it is. 
>>>> You mean you agree with me, or disagree, or what?
>>> 	My position is Pro legal immigration.  I'm no longer sure what
>>> you position is.
>> I stated it enough times you lying scumbuckewt, fuck you.
> 
> 	So you are against it.  Got it.

See, that need to lie is just ingrained in you.

>>>> You want a revolving door with no standards?
>>> 	Certainly not.  And nothing I've written can be interpreted to
>>> mean that.
>> GOOD!
>>
>> You just want "more" right?
>>
>> Maybe with NO limits eh?
> 
> 	See above.

I see you squirming.

>>>> Stupid piece of Iowa shit.
>>> 	And yet I'm still your superior in every way.
>> You couldn't be my superior if you became a Catholic, you dumb mother.
> 
> 	And yet I am 

not...

>>>>>>>>>>> The tone of
>>>>>>>>>>> your posts gives me the impression that you are against it.  If I have
>>>>>>>>>>> your position wrong, I apologize.  If I have it correct, please
>>>>>>>>>>> explain why LEGAL immigration is bad.
>>>>>>>>>> LEGAL immigration could be better if we had a more responsive quota 
>>>>>>>>>> allocation based on real world skills needs in the US.
>>>>>>>>> 	Since legal immigration is what Just Cocky has been promoting,
>>>>>>>>> please explain the beef you have with him.
>>>>>>>> Since I just explained my position, explain what beef YOU have with it!
>>>>>>> 	As I've stated, I'm very much PRO legal immigration.  I
>>>>>>> encourage anyone who wishes to come here to do so, but to do so
>>>>>>> LEGALLY.  Just Cocky has taken the same position.  As such, I can not
>>>>>>> have a beef with his position.
>>>>>> I don't want just "anyone".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I want people whose work skills and desires make them GOOD candidates.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 	When I arrived here I had no real skills.
>>>> Seems that hasn't changed much.
>>>>
>>> 	I must be doing something right. 
>> Marrying a competent woman is a start, true...
> 
> 	She is great.  There is no denying that.


If a suspect judge of character...