🚀 go-pugleaf

Kent Wills wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:38:51 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
> 
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:22:14 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:02:32 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let's see what that speech might include, shall we?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <%EJ0e.144$T95.929@news.uswest.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck *your* freedom, and fuck the war criminal US troops. They
>>>>>>>>>>> deserve to die for their war crimes.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <CKl4e.57$Sd3.880@news.uswest.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The US troops in Iraq DESERVE to DIE, they are terrorist war criminal
>>>>>>>>>>> scum, each and every one of them. 
>>>>>>>>> 	While I can not disagree with his views any more than I do, I
>>>>>>>>> do respect his right to express his views.
>>>>>>>> I don't - it's called TREASON!
>>>>>>> 	It's called free speech, and even Prof. Jonez has that right.
>>>>>> Nope - it's treason.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 	Please show how Prof. Jonez committed treason.   I know you
>>>> avoided answering that in misc.legal (and all cross-posted groups), so
>>>> there's no need to do that again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FUCK YOU DIE SOON KENT YOU SCUMHOLE BASTARD!
>>> 	Seems my comment hit very close to home.
>> Seems you side with traitors who give aid and comfort to our enemies.
> 
> 	Recognizing that someone has the right to hold and express
> his/her views is NOT the same as siding with traitors.  

Sorry, jonez IS a traitor, case closed.


>> Looks like you're one immigrant who doesn't understand his loyalty oath.
> 
> 	I took the Oath of Citizenship. Not an oath of loyalty.  Did
> you stay home sick the day they taught about immigrants at school?

Naturalization Oath of Allegiance
to the United States of America

Oath:

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and 
abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, 
state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject 
or citizen; that ***I will support and defend the Constitution and laws 
of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and 
domestic;*** "(that would be jonez)

>>>> http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/t103.htm
>>>>
>>>> TREASON - This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance.
>>>>
>>>> The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against 
>>>> the United States to consist only in levying war against them, 
>>> 	Jonez never did this.
>> Did so, he comforted our enemies.
> 
> 	He's never even met them.  

Comfort comes in many forms.

>>>> or in 
>>>> adhering to their enemies, 
>>> 	Nor this.
>> He does that too, he sides with them.
> 
> 	See above, and a good dictionary.

I've cataloged his treason.

>>>> giving them aid or comfort. 
>>> 	Third strike.  You're out, Sam.
>> His comments do both.
> 
> 	Not at all.  

Totally, you lie again.

>> Fuck you, you monumental piece of SHIT!
> 
> 	Just because you're being beaten,

Not by a scumbag who can't live to his oath like you I'm not...

>>>> This offence is 
>>>> punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person 
>>>> shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses 
>>>> to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Nice to see who YOU hang with  kent.
>>>>> 	I've never met the man.  And I haven't seen a post from him in
>>>>> months.  I've communicated with you far more than him.
>>>> SO FUCKING WHAT!!!
>>> 	I "hang" with you, more than with Jonez. It's clear that I do 
>>> "hang" with a real degenerate.
>> You don't HANG with me asshole, you just play and get smacked down.
> 
> 	As you use the work hang, I do

Nope, another lie.

>>>> I presented the EVIDENCE!
>>> 	And in doing so, proved yourself wrong.
>> You lying stupid piece of shit.
> 
> 	People are free to look for themselves and see that, except
> for items cross-posted from misc.legal, I don't post to AFB-L very
> often.

Keep lying, maybe it'll stick some day.

>>>> You made scumsucking APOLOGIES for him!
>>> 	I respect his right to have and express his views. 
>> His "views" qualify as treason.
> 
> 	Only in your mind.

By legal definition as well.

>>>>>>>> Giving "aid and comfort" tour our enemies at time of war.
>>>>>>> 	Which you have yet to prove anyone, including Prof. Jonez, has
>>>>>>> done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You might research what that means .
>>>>>>> 	I have.  And, not surprisingly, you're wrong.
>>>>>> Nope, I'm right, as always.
>>>>> 	You have been proved wrong more times than anyone has cared to
>>>>> count.
>>>> Not by you, nutsucker!
>>> 	Ken has proved you wrong many more times than I have, I'll
>>> grant you that.
>> Not by him either nutlicker.
> 
> 	He's proved you wrong 


Nope.

>>>>>>>>>>>> So get your shrink wife to psychoanalyze you bud, you need HELP.
>>>>>>>>>>> 	Just because you are embarrassed to have your undying hate for
>>>>>>>>>>> the USA 
>>>>>>>>>> You're a nutcase.
>>>>>>>>> 	You hate the U.S.  It's well documented.
>>>>>>>> You're a fucking lying piece of shit with NO proof, NO corroborative 
>>>>>>>> cites, and NO credibility whatsoever.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	You've offered the proof and corroboration yourself. There's 
>>>>>>> no need for me to search Google when you've just proved my point.
>>>>>>> 	And by proving my point, you've increased my credibility.
>>>>>> Once again you flame out.
>>>>> 	How so?  You offered the link that proves very few posts are
>>>>> about Lar$on.  Your link proves that I don't behave as one would
>>>>> expect an obsessed person to behave.
>>>>> 	Again, you've been proved wrong.  The sole difference is that
>>>>> YOU proved you are wrong.
>>>> You provided no PROOF!
>>> 	Please read above.  
>> Please go straight to HELL you piece of SHIT!
> 
> 	Didn't mature 

No you didn't.