🚀 go-pugleaf

Kent Wills wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:44:55 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
> 
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:06:37 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:42:56 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:59:02 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 	Huh? I don't even see anything even remotely Bob related here.
>>>>>>>>> Odd that you seem to.
>>>>>>>> Odd that Bob lives in Az. and YOU are now posting here, instead of your 
>>>>>>>> usual gig in AFBL.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	Odd that I'm reading and posting from ia.talk.misc.  I don't
>>>>>>> check AFBL all that much anymore.  Once a week is the norm, unless
>>>>>>> something exciting catches me.
>>>>>> Odd that so MANY of your posts are there:
>>>>> 	Odd that you dishonestly failed to mention that the bulk were
>>>>> cross posts from misc.legal.  In fact, when one clicks on my name, one
>>>>> finds only ONE post that wasn't made from misc.legal in the first
>>>>> list. 
>>>> I don;t care how many OTHER groups were on the x-post list, you were 
>>>> primarily posting about BOB!
>>>>
>>> 	Not so.  The Trusted Bible thread has had no mention of
>>> Lar$on.  Same with the multiple Cameron Brown threads.
>>
>> Kent, you have been BUSTED!
>>
> 
> 	Not in the eyes of any sane person.

In the archives of google, LOL!

>> You ARE and have BEEN an AFBL mainstay!
>>
> 
> 	I'm a bit of a regular.  I try to visit once a week.  More if
> something exciting is going on.
> 	The simple truth is, you post there far more than I do.

Nope.

>>
>>>>> 	The next most recent AFBL post listed is for Feb. 4.
>>>>> 	Now quite what one would expect for an obsessed person.
>>>> Squirm worm, it's your record on display:
>>> 	And those who wish to do so can see for themselves that very
>>> few posts are about Lar$on.  He's not the issue he once was.
>> Obssessor tries to squirm out.
> 
> 	You are?

YOU ARE, YOU SICK OCD BOB FREAK.

>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/about?hl=en
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This month's top posters
>>>>>> 65 	  	for...@it.com
>>>>>> 63 	  	compu...@gmail.com (kent)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All time top posters
>>>>>> 7597 	  	jacob...@pacbell.net
>>>>>> 5505 	  	Range...@concentric.net
>>>>>> 5109 	  	j...@thecodezone.com
>>>>>> 2895 	  	compu...@gmail.com (kent)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> your opinions have proven to be little more 
>>>>>>>>>> than revisionist slime from the get go.
>>>>>>>>> 	I post the truth.  You don't have to like it, but you do have
>>>>>>>>> to accept it.
>>>>>>>> You wouldn't know the truth if it walked up and bit you in the ass.
>>>>>>> 	Projection transference noted.
>>>>>> Psychobabble bullshit noted.
>>>>> 	It's called truth.  
>>>> You have none to offer, never do.
>>> 	Projection is a bad thing, Sam.
>> So why do you?
> 
> 	Please provide just one instance, 

You're doing it now.

>>>>>>>>> 	And what do you have against LEGAL immigration?
>>>>>>>> Nothing at all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	You must,
>>>>>> You lie again, as per always.
>>>>> 	You took a contrary position to Just Cocky, and his position
>>>>> has consistently been PRO legal immigration.
>>>> Mine is not against it either.
>>> 	Then explain why you took a contrary position to Just Cocky.
>>> It doesn't make any sense.
>> Then quote where I did, assfuck.
>>
> 
> 	Are you claiming 

Are you proving?

No...looks like you're not, fuck off child.

>>>>>>> since you have taken a position contrary to Just
>>>>>>> Cocky and me.  We are very much PRO legal immigration.
>>>>>> Of course you are, it's how YOU got here isn't it?
>>>>> 	It's how *I* got here.  I don't know the circumstances of Just
>>>>> Cocky.  He may have been born in the U.S.
>>>> And we need more responsive quotas and standards - that's my position.
>>>>
>>>> What say you?
>>> 	I say it's far too difficult as it is. 
>>
>> You mean you agree with me, or disagree, or what?
> 
> 	My position is Pro legal immigration.  I'm no longer sure what
> you position is.

I stated it enough times you lying scumbuckewt, fuck you.

>> You want a revolving door with no standards?
> 
> 	Certainly not.  And nothing I've written can be interpreted to
> mean that.

GOOD!

You just want "more" right?

Maybe with NO limits eh?

>> Stupid piece of Iowa shit.
> 
> 	And yet I'm still your superior in every way.

You couldn't be my superior if you became a Catholic, you dumb mother.

>>>>>>>>> The tone of
>>>>>>>>> your posts gives me the impression that you are against it.  If I have
>>>>>>>>> your position wrong, I apologize.  If I have it correct, please
>>>>>>>>> explain why LEGAL immigration is bad.
>>>>>>>> LEGAL immigration could be better if we had a more responsive quota 
>>>>>>>> allocation based on real world skills needs in the US.
>>>>>>> 	Since legal immigration is what Just Cocky has been promoting,
>>>>>>> please explain the beef you have with him.
>>>>>> Since I just explained my position, explain what beef YOU have with it!
>>>>> 	As I've stated, I'm very much PRO legal immigration.  I
>>>>> encourage anyone who wishes to come here to do so, but to do so
>>>>> LEGALLY.  Just Cocky has taken the same position.  As such, I can not
>>>>> have a beef with his position.
>>>> I don't want just "anyone".
>>>>
>>>> I want people whose work skills and desires make them GOOD candidates.
>>>>
>>> 	When I arrived here I had no real skills.
>>
>> Seems that hasn't changed much.
>>
> 
> 	I must be doing something right. 

Marrying a competent woman is a start, true...