🚀 go-pugleaf

Kent Wills wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:59:02 GMT, samurai <sam@rai.ki> wrote:
> 
>>> 	Huh? I don't even see anything even remotely Bob related here.
>>> Odd that you seem to.
>> Odd that Bob lives in Az. and YOU are now posting here, instead of your 
>> usual gig in AFBL.
>>
> 
> 	Odd that I'm reading and posting from ia.talk.misc.  I don't
> check AFBL all that much anymore.  Once a week is the norm, unless
> something exciting catches me.

Odd that so MANY of your posts are there:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/about?hl=en

This month's top posters
65 	  	for...@it.com
63 	  	compu...@gmail.com (kent)

All time top posters
7597 	  	jacob...@pacbell.net
5505 	  	Range...@concentric.net
5109 	  	j...@thecodezone.com
2895 	  	compu...@gmail.com (kent)

>>>> your opinions have proven to be little more 
>>>> than revisionist slime from the get go.
>>> 	I post the truth.  You don't have to like it, but you do have
>>> to accept it.
>> You wouldn't know the truth if it walked up and bit you in the ass.
> 
> 	Projection transference noted.

Psychobabble bullshit noted.

>>> 	And what do you have against LEGAL immigration?
>> Nothing at all.
>>
> 
> 	You must,

You lie again, as per always.

> since you have taken a position contrary to Just
> Cocky and me.  We are very much PRO legal immigration.

Of course you are, it's how YOU got here isn't it?

>>> The tone of
>>> your posts gives me the impression that you are against it.  If I have
>>> your position wrong, I apologize.  If I have it correct, please
>>> explain why LEGAL immigration is bad.
>> LEGAL immigration could be better if we had a more responsive quota 
>> allocation based on real world skills needs in the US.
> 
> 	Since legal immigration is what Just Cocky has been promoting,
> please explain the beef you have with him.

Since I just explained my position, explain what beef YOU have with it!