Article View: la.general
Article #1964Re: Property Rights
From: BTR1701
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:08
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:08
53 lines
4034 bytes
4034 bytes
In article <mclub1tao8ng0so5pjjjn4pho6josn772l@4ax.com>, Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:46:54 -0400, BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> > wrote: > > >You still haven't answered how any of this Iraq or Social Security crap > >has anything to do with making last week's Supreme Court decision over > >property rights Bush's fault. > > > >It's like you're just itching to rant about Social Security and Iraq and > >we're not obliging you when we stick to the topic of the Supreme Court's > >decision so you just keep bringing it up over and over and over again in > >the hopes of dragging someone into the argument you want to have. > > > >Either that or just a spectacular idiot. > > > >Which is it? > > The SCOTUS decision on eminent domain is a non-sequitur. Like hell it is. It's the topic of the fucking thread and it's what we were discussing until you showed up and went off on Social Security and Iraq. If anything is a non sequitur here, it's you and your obsessive need to bitch about your personal peeves. And given the context of the rest of your post, I'm not sure you even know what "non sequitur" actually means. > Unless it can be over ruled on appeal, it is a done deal. > There is nothing that can be done about it, unless it can > be over ruled on appeal. Perhaps you should go back and take a high school level civics class and pay attention this time. Congress can overrule the Supreme Court quite easily: it's called a constitutional amendment. Also, Congress has the power to limit the jurisdiction of the federal courts. They could remove eminent domain cases from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, then pass a law that in effect reverses their decision. "Nothing can be done about it" my ass. The folks in the black robes aren't demigods. What they do can be reversed. > I don't know how to go about an appeal of this infamous decision, but > someone with your high intelligence certainly would. Truer words were never spoken. > I'm leaving this thread for more important things. Thank fucking god. We've all had enough of you.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<btr1702-93DAEA.00080927062005@news.giganews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<5btpb15id8mtrtrpmbbb5hge5nur75ge40@4ax.com> <6tvqb1dtmugm8htduvkoch9d5scgpe1uh3@4ax.com> <j46rb1hvluu463c0vad1fk70h4rlhavvfk@4ax.com> <8vesb1184j2aq6vbac8p8eihc6o9els8vc@4ax.com> <6cgsb1lpm3tg5v4usc7b68e8kn9dd4s57s@4ax.com> <btr1702-54827B.02283026062005@news.giganews.com> <60ksb119dmp8p22cgjj1fa3e0kmigvpmc7@4ax.com> <btr1702-B1E88D.08421026062005@news.giganews.com> <109ub1hngv1pfjssa3g8igfc1rrh22bikj@4ax.com> <btr1702-266133.20465426062005@news.giganews.com> <mclub1tao8ng0so5pjjjn4pho6josn772l@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 107d03,20b64dc50135b03 X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,c1f56bd56a67cdd4 X-Google-Thread: 10d50a,32c0bf5d5229c9c X-Google-Thread: 10e901,32c0bf5d5229c9c X-Google-Thread: 109c93,7d53be15ec46d303 X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,gid106ed4,gid10d50a,gid10e901,gid109c93,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:08:10 -0500 From: BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: la.general,ca.general,scruz.general,misc.survivalism,alt.tv.the-west-wing Subject: Re: Property Rights References: <5btpb15id8mtrtrpmbbb5hge5nur75ge40@4ax.com> <6tvqb1dtmugm8htduvkoch9d5scgpe1uh3@4ax.com> <j46rb1hvluu463c0vad1fk70h4rlhavvfk@4ax.com> <8vesb1184j2aq6vbac8p8eihc6o9els8vc@4ax.com> <6cgsb1lpm3tg5v4usc7b68e8kn9dd4s57s@4ax.com> <btr1702-54827B.02283026062005@news.giganews.com> <60ksb119dmp8p22cgjj1fa3e0kmigvpmc7@4ax.com> <btr1702-B1E88D.08421026062005@news.giganews.com> <109ub1hngv1pfjssa3g8igfc1rrh22bikj@4ax.com> <btr1702-266133.20465426062005@news.giganews.com> <mclub1tao8ng0so5pjjjn4pho6josn772l@4ax.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:08:09 -0400 Message-ID: <btr1702-93DAEA.00080927062005@news.giganews.com> Lines: 53 X-Trace: sv3-ogizrPGpIkzc223Mk1w/s0Q56Gt5pxEhZeviTshsiE6yo8G6QmGATyAZGN/bXpmd1jv/8OvR+1piknH!NPQvfLTU85rJP7W11I8689+dFmtaSzkfNq4rUE1YnqnT9p+XenE145r6GX2AbxJL3H4bFNqS1ltk!/A== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32