🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:37:56 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
<ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:

>
>"Zeno" <Zeno@home.kom> wrote in message 
>news:j4l9e29hct5g3rcdg259itigv7pijemhgp@4ax.com...
>> Most all of your arguments, in (indirect) defense of muslims, is
>> irrelevant.
>
>You can not show ANY defense of Muslims ( direct or indirect )
>from any of my postings. Absolutely none. Zip. Zilch. Zero.

You are correct.  You chose only one topic of diversion from the post
topic (Lebanese Holocaust) - chemical weapons.  I would note that the
M.O. of the propaganda jihadists is / was similar.

>>
>> The fact still remains that the muslim "religion" (yes the entire
>> religion) has declared war on America.
>
>Not True. But now that you have now made this claim:
>Where can we peruse that Declaration of War by
>the ' muslim "religion" (yes the entire religion) ' on
>America. ( and show your work...)

The declaration of war was in the given link.

>
>
> > The nations that have been
>> attacked by muslims need to unite and defeat it's enemy.
>
>Let's look at WHY the Arab street isn't too wild about us:
>* The nations that have been
> *attacked by AMERICA need to unite and defeat it's enemy.
>
>See? That was simple.

They have been chanting "Death to America" at muslim religious rallies
in the middle east for years.  See the movie "Obsession" for the tv
video clips.  Further, the reason why they do this is in the movie as
well.  And it's not simply because of US foreign policy.  It's because
the muslim religion has been commanded by Allah, via the Quran, to
take over the world with this religion.  The bad part is the world is
now financing those efforts via oil.

>
>Mike couldn't prove his wild-assed claim that
>"... there is verifiable proof that saddam DID have WMD's".
>As you have leapt into the breach, topposting and all, would you like to 
>step
>up to the plate and have a swing at that, too?
>
>Or do you wish to swing that over-ripe red herring around the joint
>and stink up the place? Or are you just a 'fluffer' for Mike?
>
>
>
>
>>
>> http://www.ict.org.il/articles/fatwah.htm
>>
>> You can continue "spinning" the argument away from that fact if you
>> want...
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:51:25 GMT, "pitchforks and torches"
>> <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote:
>>
>>>They only thing you're resting is your flacid dick in KRPs mouth.
>>>
>>>Where IS the proof of the existance of WMDs prior to
>>>Bush-the-greater-stupid's illegal invasion of Iraq?
>>>You claimed "However there is verifiable proof that saddam DID have 
>>>WMD's",
>>>but you offered crap instead of verifiable proof. Own up to your perfidy,
>>>liar.
>>
>> 
>