🚀 go-pugleaf

Eric Maes wrote:
> 
> Douglas S. Oliver wrote:
> >
> > Something looks very wrong here.  Your physical drives, not
> > partitions, use the hda, hdb, hdc designations.  Partitions would be
> > hda1 hda5, hdb1 hdb5, etc.  Unless hda or hdb is not a hard drive, hdc
> > could not be a hard drive.  That would make three hard drives.  -- d
> >
> 
> Hmm, I must have been really confused by this whole upgrade  business...
> In fact, my first disk is hda, which has 3 partitions, hda1 and hda2
> both NTFS on which NT is installed and an FAT partition called hda3. My
> second disk is indeed hdc. I just checked with fdisk, and I do not have
> a hdb. 

Hello, is your CD-ROM your secondary (slave) device on IDE channel 1? 
My old 'test' box was set up that way and my CD-ROM was /dev/hdb, the
other two HD's on the second IDE channel were /dev/hdc and /dev/hdd.
HTH
-- 
I use a fake e-mail address because of SPAM, 
do not e-mail me because I don't exist.