🚀 go-pugleaf

All are protected by "smart" UPS.  The several of the PM-3s that failed
were at different sites



Penelope Baker wrote:
> 
> Better check your power?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Bevins [mailto:johnb@sierratel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 1:59 PM
> > To: Roy
> > Cc: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> > Subject: Re: (PM) Livingston hardware reliability?
> >
> >
> > We have a 0% failure rate on our PM3s....... and that is the rate I
> > like!!!
> >
> > John Bevins
> > Sierra Tel Internet
> >
> >
> > Roy wrote:
> > >
> > > This not flame bait but is anyone else seeing high failure rates on
> > > Livingston equipment?
> > >
> > > PM-3   -- 30% failure of main chassis + three modem cards
> > > PM-2ER -- 100% failure of these.  Every unit has been replaced.
> > > PM-2E  -- These are great.  Only one failure of a 10-port
> > card and that
> > > was received bad.
> > >
> > > The PM-3 number is a bit scary.  The sample is not small.
> > The PM-2ER
> > > count is very low and could be a fluke.
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> > > 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> > > Searchable list archive:
> > <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> > 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> > Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
> >
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>