Article View: man.general
Article #14Re: Free Speech (was Re: BARBARA AMERO COMPLAINTS !!!!!!)
From: Barbara Amero
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 00:00
56 lines
3457 bytes
3457 bytes
Larry Phillips wrote: > > Cameron Neumann wrote: > > >Larry Phillips wrote: > > > >> However, we do not have free speech in Canada. Some speech that isn't > >> nice, falls under a variety of laws (see the statutes of 'hate > >> literature' for an example. > > > > Don't make the mistake of assuming that just because a right is > > recognized by only one or a few countries that it only applies to > > citizens of those countries. There are many rights that are man's by > > his nature (re Locke). If a government or state doesn't recognize it > > it doesn't mean their citizens don't have it, it means it is being > > suppressed. > > And if it's being suppressed, we don't have it. I note that in your post that Cameron replied to you did not say that we don't have the _right_ to free speech, you noted that we do not have free speech, which is not the same as saying we don't have the right to free speech. Then Cameron went on his rant about rights. Cameron says, "there are many rights that are man's by his nature (re Locke)." How about women, Cameron? Do you see women as having many rights that are woman's by her nature?? Such as having a voice in this public forum, even if man does not like the voice?? Cameron went on to say, "if a government or state doesn't recognize it doesn't mean their citizens don't have it, it means it is being suppressed." I suggest that whether or not we have a right to free speech or anything else, or should have a right, is debateable. I know little about Locke, the philosopical force behind the American Declaration of Independence, and his notion of certain "self-evident natural rights". Bentham, a British philosopher (1748-1832) dismissed Locke's notion of self-evident natural rights as "nonsense on stilts". Skinner's book, "Beyond Freedom and Dignity" (1971) was, said Skinner, "an effort to demonstrate how things go bad when you make a fetish out of individual freedom and dignity. If you insist that individual rights are the summum bonum, then the whole structure of society falls down." Barbara A. Amero
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<34CB806C.71A1@dbis.ns.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<34b4fa63.0@lightning.ica.net> <34b5d2c9.10604620@news.interlog.com> <34B64CE3.1A17@direct.ca> <34bab759.3181023@news.interlog.com> <34BE1A73.1383@unl.ac.uk> <34be7706.400467@news1.on.sympatico.ca> <FDE1797CDFD2FD42.5FF3E8391C32B214.E63D8B8D238375D4@library-proxy.airnews.net> <34CAD656.7D73@bc.rogers.wave.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f504b,21801ec2b15df517 X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public X-Google-Thread: fc3d0,26eb31bc1d3d1b30 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc3d0,public X-Google-Thread: 112f74,7a11f2245da7fba9 X-Google-Attributes: gid112f74,public X-Google-Thread: f7b9c,21801ec2b15df517 X-Google-Attributes: gidf7b9c,public X-Google-Thread: f67a2,fe65daf04f2541af X-Google-Attributes: gidf67a2,public X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,e378da87d5ec4fed X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public From: Barbara Amero <amero@dbis.ns.ca> Subject: Re: Free Speech (was Re: BARBARA AMERO COMPLAINTS !!!!!!) Date: 1998/01/25 Message-ID: <34CB806C.71A1@dbis.ns.ca> X-Deja-AN: 319157638 Cache-Post-Path: nala.dbis.ns.ca!unknown@ts1-30.hfx.dbis.ns.ca Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <34b4fa63.0@lightning.ica.net> <34b5d2c9.10604620@news.interlog.com> <34B64CE3.1A17@direct.ca> <34bab759.3181023@news.interlog.com> <34BE1A73.1383@unl.ac.uk> <34be7706.400467@news1.on.sympatico.ca> <FDE1797CDFD2FD42.5FF3E8391C32B214.E63D8B8D238375D4@library-proxy.airnews.net> <34CAD656.7D73@bc.rogers.wave.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: DBIS Internet Services Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: man.general,can.general,bc.general,ns.general,ab.general,ont.general