🚀 go-pugleaf

RE: The Finchish Inquisition!

Finch (canadian@NOicenterspam.net) wrote:
: Barbara Amero wrote:
: (snipped)
Finch (canadian@NOicenterspam.net) wrote:

: BA, how heavily are you medicated?  

You seem to have a keen interest in medication and mental illness, not
just mine but also other posters. I noticed that you recently posted
to Stephen:

Finch (canadian@NOicenterspam.net) wrote:
>Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha!!!!
>Stephen, that was great!!!!
>It took me awhile but I finally realized you must be either insane,
>stupid or have a wonderfully sarcastic sense of humor.
>Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!

No doubt it did take you awhile. However, the point is you mention
that he might be "insane". You seem to be fixated on insanity. 
Perhaps you are projecting your own instability, insanity, medicated
state onto others?? I note that you post in alt.support.trauma and
alt.paranoia, do you have a problem?

If you check out my public files, you will find that I am opposed to
psychiatric oppression as it relates to medication, ECT, psychosurgery
-- all of which has been used predominantly against women, tho' men
are also victims of such atrocities.

: If you were to gather all your posts and read them at once you would
: find that you repeat yourself over and over again - as if this will
: convince anyone that you are in any way correct.  

So you've gathered all my posts and read them at once and found that
I repeat myself over and over again. All 3000 of them (or however many 
it is that posters say I've made). I'll bet you needed some medication
after that. (VBG) Perhaps you are now reading all my posts in all threads
I post in, but likely not all posters read all my posts in any one thread
I post in or all threads I post in. And new readers subscribe who would
not have seen any of my posts when hitting on their first Barbara Amero
post. Therefore not all are subjected to me repeating myself over and
over again. In fact, no one is subjected to such, unless you choose to
read. Apparently quite a few people choose to read and likely some stop
reading if it's just more of the same or if they simply don't like my
posts. The point is Jean, it is not up to you to decide how I should
make my posts and whether or not others should have access to them.

: In logical argument the key is to raise a point (or points) which
: support your position and if that doesn't work then raise another
: point to your benefit.  You just go on and on and on using the same
: points.  

I do/did. I raised "beergut", as a point only thankgawd.

: And if someone disagrees with you you then claim that you are being
: abused/assaulted/stalked/attacked/etc/etc/ect.  Come on BA.  

Come on JF. If you know so much about me and my posts, then you would
know that I don't accuse someone of the above for disagreeing with me.

: And when posters then disagree with that you then try and discredit the
: validity of their position by combing other newsgroups for stuff.  This
: is rational discussion?  Puleeeez!

You're right some miffed that I made a post about that "wonderful man",
i.e. the "hubby" of your buddy Michelle, which put him in a bad light
and by extension his "old lady...er wife". Again, I wasn't "combing
other newsgroups for stuff" on "beergut", I hit on *your* Author Profile,
saw wpg.general and found you replying to the "bull", i.e. "beergut".
What he had to say was relevant to the so-called discussion with 
Michelle. My discussion was rational, i.e. having reason, reasonable,
and I made my point. If I hadn't, you would have been able to refute
what I had to say, rather than attack me and my mental health. It is 
you not having rational discussion, you behaving in an irrational way,
defending your buddy and "beergut", 'cause I took the bull by the horn.

: Jean
: (p.s I have tried to spare the ngs not directly connected to the poster
: and myself)

Hmm... controlling and yet another erroneous assumption. The ngs you
deleted  are directly connected to me, i.e. people who are connected 
to me are following this thread in ngs you deleted. Is not being able 
to control people, places and things a problem for you? Perhaps you
should do some more "Journal" writing and reflect on your controlling,
assumptive behavior.
  ____________________________________________________________________

 Barbara A. Amero  http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~ak955/Profile.html
                   http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~ak955
                   http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~ak955/familist.html
                   http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~ak955/christmas.html