🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: mi.misc
Article #436

Re: Incidence of payroll-deducted taxes

#436
From: Harold Brashears
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 00:00
33 lines
2747 bytes
johne@mainelink.net (John E. Lavin) wrote for all to see:

>In your rant, you made the folling statement:

>   >ALL of the cost of ALL payroll-deducted taxes is paid by the
>   >employEr.  ALL of it.  NONE of that money EVER goes to ANY employeE,
>   >so since he never had it in the first place, how can he have paid it?

>This is an absolutely false statement.

That part is true.  The previous poster's statement is false.

>  The costs incured by an empolyer for 
>administration are fully tax deductible.  Therefore the costs are borne by 
>every American citizen, every employee who pays taxes.

Actually, since a business can deduct all of the operating costs,
including all of the salaries (and taxes on those salaries) it pays,
your point here is obscure.  Are you implying that the taxpayer pays
the salaries at Joe Blows Paint Shop, since Joe can deduct the
salaries?  By the same token, the taxpayer bears the burden of Joe
Blow's new grease gun, since he can also dedust that.

>I would suggest that you try, yes try, to get your facts straight BEFORE you 
>stick you foot in your mouth.

Regards, Harold
----
"I was an early Clinton fan, but now I've come to the conclusion that the
problem is Clinton and his failure to provide party leadership...Clinton
enjoys no respect from the party." 
- Terry Michaels, former press secretary, Democratic National
  Committee (The Washington Times, 7/2/95)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4crr29$461@thorn.cc.usm.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <490s4o$eku@nexus.coast.net> <499sg8$elm@villa.fc.net> <GREENEG.95Dec22140325@dali.cs.unc.edu> <DKA1LE.4q2@argo.net> <GREENEG.96Jan3153605@excalibur.cs.unc.edu> <4cj0t0$265@news.mainelink.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 104eff,51bcef2ffa437c30
X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public
X-Google-Thread: 104158,51bcef2ffa437c30
X-Google-Attributes: gid104158,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d662,fe496bb546a1da4c
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d662,public
X-Google-Thread: 105ecf,51bcef2ffa437c30
X-Google-Attributes: gid105ecf,public
X-Google-Thread: ffe14,51bcef2ffa437c30
X-Google-Attributes: gidffe14,public
X-Google-Thread: 10dda6,51bcef2ffa437c30
X-Google-Attributes: gid10dda6,public
X-Google-Thread: fa7f5,51bcef2ffa437c30
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa7f5,public
X-Google-Thread: 105dfd,51bcef2ffa437c30
X-Google-Attributes: gid105dfd,public
From: brshears@whale.st.usm.edu (Harold Brashears)
Subject: Re: Incidence of payroll-deducted taxes
Date: 1996/01/08
Message-ID: <4crr29$461@thorn.cc.usm.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 134427128
references: <490s4o$eku@nexus.coast.net> <499sg8$elm@villa.fc.net> <GREENEG.95Dec22140325@dali.cs.unc.edu> <DKA1LE.4q2@argo.net> <GREENEG.96Jan3153605@excalibur.cs.unc.edu> <4cj0t0$265@news.mainelink.net>
organization: University of Southern Mississippi
newsgroups: mi.misc,alt.politics.usa.misc,alt.activism,talk.politics.misc,ca.politics,dc.politics,ne.politics,nj.politics,pa.politics,triangle.politics,misc.taxes,ny.politics