🚀 go-pugleaf

"Verne" <Verne@whitetrashcafe.com> wrote in message
news:tt66t4qpunbleb@corp.supernews.com...

> > >> Another conspiracy nut
> > >
> > >How so?  Even the most limited observational powers and comprehension
of
> > >logic will allow one to see that any politician and/or
> bureaucracy -will-,
> > >when given the proverbial inch, take the proverbial mile.
> > >
> > >If you don't/can't/won't see this, it doesn't say much for you, does
it?
> >
> > It's the same in the UK, btw.  The PM is openly speaking against
> > thw whole idea of human rights and is, for example, demanding the power
> > to  imprison political prisoners indefinitely without trial.  The only
> > thing stopping him is the fact that he has signed a human rights
> > convention preventing things like that, but I doubt if that will stop
him.
> >
> > He did say that the UK authorities did not need greater powers
> > to spy on British subjects using mobile phones or the internet.
> > That is true - they have total power to do that now.  Blanket
> > surveillance is legal.  No warrant required.  No suspicion of
> > criminal activity required.  Blanket surveillance on any or all
> > of the population.
>
> Ok to both of you, your [sic] making the point that this terrorist act is
a plot
> to take away individual freedom from the western nations of the UK and the
> USA. Making the point that some freedom may suffer a temporary setback
due
> to this act of war is not making that point. You need to show a connection
> between our governments and the bombing. Your idle speculation is mindless
> and useless

I made NO such point.  I'm using my eyes and brain to SEE exactly what human
nature and -power- does to someone in power.

I need make no such connection, either as it isn't relevant to my comment.
Nor was this relevant to your "another conspiracy nut" comment.

>  Make that point or admit your [sic] just spouting b.s.

You just can't stand that someone saw through your BS.