🚀 go-pugleaf

"Steve Henderson" <etaoinsh@keytech.com> wrote in message
news:tt68bjkslut3de@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Verne" <Verne@whitetrashcafe.com> wrote in message
> news:tt66t4qpunbleb@corp.supernews.com...
>
> > > >> Another conspiracy nut
> > > >
> > > >How so?  Even the most limited observational powers and comprehension
> of
> > > >logic will allow one to see that any politician and/or
> > bureaucracy -will-,
> > > >when given the proverbial inch, take the proverbial mile.
> > > >
> > > >If you don't/can't/won't see this, it doesn't say much for you, does
> it?
> > >
> > > It's the same in the UK, btw.  The PM is openly speaking against
> > > thw whole idea of human rights and is, for example, demanding the
power
> > > to  imprison political prisoners indefinitely without trial.  The only
> > > thing stopping him is the fact that he has signed a human rights
> > > convention preventing things like that, but I doubt if that will stop
> him.
> > >
> > > He did say that the UK authorities did not need greater powers
> > > to spy on British subjects using mobile phones or the internet.
> > > That is true - they have total power to do that now.  Blanket
> > > surveillance is legal.  No warrant required.  No suspicion of
> > > criminal activity required.  Blanket surveillance on any or all
> > > of the population.
> >
> > Ok to both of you, your [sic] making the point that this terrorist act
is
> a plot
> > to take away individual freedom from the western nations of the UK and
the
> > USA. Making the point that some freedom may suffer a temporary setback
> due
> > to this act of war is not making that point. You need to show a
connection
> > between our governments and the bombing. Your idle speculation is
mindless
> > and useless
>
> I made NO such point.  I'm using my eyes and brain to SEE exactly what
human
> nature and -power- does to someone in power.
>
> I need make no such connection, either as it isn't relevant to my comment.
> Nor was this relevant to your "another conspiracy nut" comment.
>
> >  Make that point or admit your [sic] just spouting b.s.
>
> You just can't stand that someone saw through your BS.

You can not and will never show a conspiracy. In other words you have no
point to make so you went off in another direction.

So is your claim now that this terrorist activity may have coincidentally
caused a loss of personally freedom?

And that some in power may like this?  Who are these people and why would
they do this?

Do they have a dark purpose?

 Are they involved with the terrorists in some way?

Nobody on this thread seems able to stick to a point. Try making one and
back it up, if not with facts at lest with reason

Verne
>
>
>
>
>
>