🚀 go-pugleaf

Try to get a document notarized in some states (Calif, for one) without
leaving a thumbprint & having at least one photo ID. Forget it! Your
complaints to everybody who has no problem with being ID'd seem strange. 

I laugh to think that the fly by night "contractors" who rush to your bank
when they finish a job to cash your check, regardless of your satisfaction,
will now be identified in case of prosecution for fraud. Love it!

Rick
-- 

Fredrick Rea O'Keefe ("Rick")

*********
SUPPORT JAYNE HITCHCOCK- help defeat cyberstalking and on-line scams.
for more info. check out- 
http://www.geocities.com/hollywood/6172/helpjane.htm
Legal Fund Donations willing accepted and appreciated.  PO Box 4424,
Crofton, MD 21114
*********

unidextr@mindspring.com wrote in article
<341dd127.27119849@news.mindspring.com>...
> 
> On Fri, 05 Sep 1997 14:41:00 -0700, Patrick <patrickl@wco.com> wrote:
> 
> >> >This system sounds scary but is in fact harmless. Even if they keep
your
> >> >thumb print on file so what. The only agency that could use the print
> >> >would be a law enforcement agency running it through the DMV data
base.
> >> >
> >> >The whole purpose of the system is to cut down on stolen/forged
checks.
> >> >
> >> 
> >> I remember the photos, but NEVER during the 23 years that I lived in
> >> New Jersey was I ever finger printed under these circumstances (or any
> >> other for that matter!)  You might try refreshing your imagination
> >> about the fingerprinting in the super market, because it certainly
> >> must be a figment of your imagination for you to come up with garbage
> >> like that!
> >
> >Well bub, it may be garbage to you, but it's a fact. Since you have
> >lived in NJ since 1974 and not 1973 perhaps you missed it.
> >
> 
> 
> Actually, it would have had to have been since 1993 - that is when I
> left NJ, it certainly was not anytime between 1974 and 1968 - I never
> encountered it then either.  And what is so harmless about having YOUR
> fingerprints passed around by any law enforcement agency that wanted
> them?  And has the DMV in New Jersey started to treat the state's
> citizen like criminals since I left?  Hell when I was there (and I
> understand it is still true) you do not even have to have your picture
> on your driver's license unless you want it there, has this changed
> too - that is on renewals, it was not an option on new licenses then!)
> 
> I hope it will not disturb you when some enforcer from a government
> agency comes knocking on your door in the middle of the night to take
> you into custody based on a match of your fingerprint on the rebate
> check you cashed from Intuit!
>