Article View: misc.consumers
Article #5014Re: ATTN: RENTERS
From: Lon Stowell
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 00:20
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 00:20
51 lines
2800 bytes
2800 bytes
In article <1993Jan7.214846.18538@samba.oit.unc.edu> Michael.Bohl@launchpad.unc.edu (Michael Bohl) writes: > >Fellow home or apartment renters, > > While $1/month is not alot to each individual, when multiplied by >millions of people it becomes a substantial sum of money. I will wager >that most renters are paying the phone company an additional $1/month >unecessarily. Check you bill. > > However, as a renter, you do not own the lines and hold NO >respnsibility to carry this 'insurance'. Do you carry 'insurance' which >will pay for the repair of the electrical wiring inside the walls? No, of >course not. > Actually I can offer counter facts. I am a renter. I did not buy the extra "wiring maintenance" charge. When I moved in, I discovered that there was a fault in the internal wiring. The telephone company agreed to fix it or I could use a private contractor, or fix it myself. I contacted the leasing office and they pointed out a paragraph in the lease....although they might own the property, very few rentals in Calif include free maintenance of telco wiring. So although you don't "own" the lines, if you want telephone service you'll have to pay for repairs yourself...or buy the insurance. And in most rental properties you might just be forbidden from crawling around in the walls or opening the covers of the demarc. So I'd ignore this posting for the first month. Pay the extra wiring maintenance charge for the FIRST month until you are certain the wiring is in good condition. Then you just call the phone company and cancel the service..which they will politely do. And lest you suspect the phone company's motives, that advice came FROM the phone company. They noted very correctly that rarely does wiring fail as long as it remains in service... [They still charged me the $75 bucks, though...] > I called the company a few years ago and the clerk who answered the >phone INSISTED that I was responsible for the wiring in the walls, even as >a renter. Of course, that makes no sense at all as I related in the >previous analogy. Think for a moment how many MILLIONS of dollars are >collected each year for which NO service is ever rendered. > The clerk was correct but for the wrong reason....
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<184847@pyramid.pyramid.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!lstowellShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!lstowell From: lstowell@pyrnova.mis.pyramid.com (Lon Stowell) Newsgroups: misc.consumers Subject: Re: ATTN: RENTERS Message-ID: <184847@pyramid.pyramid.com> Date: 8 Jan 93 00:20:19 GMT Sender: daemon@pyramid.pyramid.com Reply-To: lstowell@pyrnova.pyramid.com.pyramid.com (Lon Stowell) Distribution: usa Organization: Pyramid Technology Corporation Lines: 51