Article View: misc.consumers
Article #8539Re: Should this man have been convicted?
From: Me
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:23
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:23
35 lines
3404 bytes
3404 bytes
In article <1192abe3.0302070235.7623545d@posting.google.com>, amp_spamfree@yahoo.com (amp_spamfree) wrote: > > I have yet to see any evidence of this other than some quotes from his > supporters. I simply raised the question - was he in compliance with > the legislation (not the proposition) in force in California at that > time. True, but at the very least, the defendant should have had an opportunity to show that evidence during his trial. > > > As far as the federal law is concerned, its legality was upheld by the > > > Supreme Court which is substantive evidence that it is a "good" law. > > > The US SC is the final say so on those issues - that's their job and > > > whether you agree or disagree with their rulings, only Congress can > > > overturn by writing new legislation. > > > > I'm not sure exactly which law you are refering to > > The DEA scheduling of marijuana which classes it as not having > medicinal value. That's only because the feds refuse to even study the question of marijuana. If you never look, its easy to deny anything. > > but I don't think > > all of the issues in this case have been tested by the Supremes. > > The SC upheld the federal prohibition of marijuana use in medical > treatments. Well, they might overturn that decision. The SC certainly does overturn decisions on ocassion when more facts are revealed. It is unsual though for overturns to happen, from what I have heard.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<srhi-890D46.08233907022003@news.comcast.giganews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!peernews-us.colt.net!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!nntp2.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<3E4046EB.8C37D94B@nospam.com> <5yY%9.5418$Xz4.339468@news2.west.cox.net> <3e41336a@news.vigoris.net> <onb0a.17604$Xz4.579788@news2.west.cox.net> <3e414659$1@news.vigoris.net> <1192abe3.0302060506.17155754@posting.google.com> <b63b43e.0302062111.54aff87b@posting.google.com> <1192abe3.0302070235.7623545d@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,b930db7c113fc78e X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,b930db7c113fc78e X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 10fa57,b930db7c113fc78e X-Google-Attributes: gid10fa57,public X-Google-Thread: f4552,b930db7c113fc78e X-Google-Attributes: gidf4552,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-07 05:23:41 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!peernews-us.colt.net!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!nntp2.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 07:23:40 -0600 From: Me <srhi@comcast.net> Newsgroups: misc.consumers,sci.med.pharmacy,ca.general,ok.general Subject: Re: Should this man have been convicted? References: <3E4046EB.8C37D94B@nospam.com> <5yY%9.5418$Xz4.339468@news2.west.cox.net> <3e41336a@news.vigoris.net> <onb0a.17604$Xz4.579788@news2.west.cox.net> <3e414659$1@news.vigoris.net> <1192abe3.0302060506.17155754@posting.google.com> <b63b43e.0302062111.54aff87b@posting.google.com> <1192abe3.0302070235.7623545d@posting.google.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 08:23:39 -0500 Message-ID: <srhi-890D46.08233907022003@news.comcast.giganews.com> Lines: 35 NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.44.38.128 X-Trace: sv3-ILJhZTA3y40MKpTkeAc1jpoHQs3MweT7tc0i+LQJtFf43fjCHgf4Pq0HfIqasrDJuIPwKUdYDEwr1V1!J3pBtTWCe2qIdNBj9KpxGVWOTfxxrr2aQKjr6bNyN+gvFFVcw2U3CgYoWDolymrs8VDIgjJ5UgWM!r6lOotds X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1