🚀 go-pugleaf

Comm wrote:

> Hi, see in.
> 
> "Rudy Canoza" <someguy@ph.con> wrote in message 
> news:lB6Je.1680$Je.1238@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> 
>>Comm wrote:
>>
>>
>>><* US *> wrote in message 
>>>news:iqv4f117pliv8hudnohkk59l1sg7su8kgm@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:16:38 GMT, "Comm" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>The ONLY thing that marginalizes blacks today is BLACKS ...
>>>>
>>>>That is not true.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, it is true - it is too too true, too horribly true.
>>
>>It is not true that self-marginalization is the only thing causing social 
>>pathology among blacks, but it is the biggest and worst part of it.
> 
> 
> Agree, but when they self marginalize they do a lot more than that. 
> Encouraging bad behavior and intimidating blacks that are smart and who 
> study is a big part of it, too.

That's a big part of the self-marginalization.  What's 
disgusting is when academic white so-called "liberals" 
encourage it.


> 
>>A big contributing factor is the racist encouragement and support given to 
>>black self-marginalization by so-called "liberals" like Bob LeChevalier 
>>and this '*US*' moron.
> 
> 
> Agree. It comes to a shock when white interviewers interview intelligent and 
> educated blacks - hear one the other day.  The black said outright that he 
> would prefer to NOT see white faces next door, he'd prefer to NOT see whites 
> when he takes his wife out to a club.  He wants things like the Old Harlem 
> used to be - all blacks.  He is comfortable with that and prefers it.
> 
> The white interviewer didn't DARE say to him "but that's wrong, there is no 
> diversity."  That IS what many educated and intelligent blacks DO prefer. 
> It's called comfort levels.

The lying academic white pseudo-liberal would try to 
have it both ways.  When speaking at a distance, e.g. 
in articles or opinion pieces, they push a fully 
integrationist agenda.  But at the same time, they also 
push for some "right" to ethnic separatism, but a right 
*ONLY* held by the ethnic minorities, or "people of 
color", in their infelicitous and wretched new-speak.

The key point is, white liberals do *NOT* want ethnic 
minorities to achieve true social and economic 
equality, because then there would be no need for white 
liberals insofar as race is concerned.  They want to 
keep minorities, but especially blacks, in a dependent 
client relationship; it validates the existence and 
ideology of white liberals.


>>>>Anti-black racism is still doing significant damage to nonwhites.
>>>
>>>
>>>I am non-white.  I've heard enough of it - whiteboy.  I can call you a 
>>>honky and it's not hate speech, ya see?
>>>
>>>
>>>>You probably starve and kick your dog and then try to accuse
>>>>him of meanness when he bites you.
>>>
>>>
>>>I do not believe in "owning" animals of any kind, including human 
>>>animals.
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.yubanet.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/6/15896
>>>
>>>
>