Article View: misc.education
Article #2128Re: EDITORIAL: Stinko de Mayo - School administrators need a lesson in right and wrong
From: Not Sure
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 00:49
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 00:49
114 lines
6243 bytes
6243 bytes
On May 8, 3:13 pm, Bob LeChevalier <loj...@lojban.org> wrote: > "Leroy N. Soetoro" <leroysoet...@usurper.org> wrote: > > >http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/07/stinko-de-mayo/ > >On May 5, five students at Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill, Calif., > >were sent home for wearing clothing featuring the American flag. Their > >offense: trespassing on Mexican heritage during Cinco de Mayo. > >Administrators called the flag-wearing "incendiary" and likely to cause > >violence. The school district overrode the decision, and the boys were > >allowed to return to school. In response yesterday, about 200 students > >staged a walkout carrying Mexican flags. The question is: Who taught > >these kids to hate America so much? > > Who said that they hate America? > > They may just feel that unusual displays of American patriotism are an > insult to their celebration of a distinctly Mexican patriotic and > cultural celebration. It's always so funny when racist illegal alien lovers comment stupidly. Thanks for your contribution, worthless :) > > Kinda like singing Christmas hymns at a Hanukkah party. > > American flag tshirts wouldn't be especially appropriate at a > Christmas Mass, Chinese New Year, or that Hanukah party either. And > patriotic as it might be, I doubt if you would be admitted to a White > House formal dinner wearing an American flag tee shirt. > > >There should be nothing disrespectful about the U.S. flag to Americans > >of Mexican descent or to any other immigrant group. > > There is something disrespectful about ANYTHING out-of-culture at a > cultural celebration. > > >Teaching children that their heritage is at odds with their citizenship > > It isn't teaching that. > > >While the high school's administrators may have been > >responding to a real public-safety threat, that threat was the product > >of their failure to instill a sense of national pride in their students. > > Patriotism is NOT obligatory. > > >Identity politics has become such a staple of public life and education > >in recent decades that incidents like this illustrate the poisonous > >effects it has on the nation. > > Only when someone doesn't respect different cultural identities is > there a problem. > > >In the past, immigrant groups would > >attempt to outdo each other in demonstrating their patriotic attachment > >to the country that gave them safety, opportunity and freedom. > > Sometimes. Sometimes, not. Chinese in California, not necessarily. > Mexicans in what used to be part of Mexico, not necessarily. > > >Today, immigrant activist groups think patriotism is at best an inconvenience, > >at worst a sellout. > > No, it is one possible expression of free speech. But when done in > the form of challenging another expression of free speech, it is > sometimes called "fighting words". > > >It is odd that Cinco de Mayo has become a focus of conflict. > > It is only a focus of "conflict" for those Americans who seem to have > a problem with others celebrating it. It takes two opposing sides to > fight, and there is no legitimate justification for fighting against > their cultural expression. > > >But in the United > >States, it has become the de facto Mexican nationalist day, a far cry > >from its origins in the 1980s as a marketing gimmick by beer importers > >to sell brews that taste best with lime wedges. > > I grew up in California in the 1960s, and it had nothing to do with > beer. > > >Not all flags are created equal. Some flags may be fashion statements, > >but the American flag is the patriotic symbol of the nation in which we > >live. > > But again there are places where it is inappropriate. > > >Schools should spend less time telling patriotic > >students not to cause a ruckus simply by wearing the national colors and > >more time teaching the kids who are offended by the American flag how > >wrongheaded their views are. > > They are not "offended by the American flag". They are offended by > those who wear the American flag as a political expression *against > their culture*. > > >This might require teachers and > >administrators to begin making value judgments and moral choices for the > >benefit of the children they are charged with educating. > > Teachers and administrators should not be doing so. That is a > parental choice. > > >The Stars and Stripes should be a proud statement of unity for all. > > The flag stands for whatever people want it to stand for. Not > everyone sees in it the same symbol that you do. > > lojbab > --- > Bob LeChevalier - artificial linguist; genealogist > loj...@lojban.org Lojban languagewww.lojban.org
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<959bd7e9-fdf0-487b-9ce4-f17202cdb602@o14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9D71AA6A71E946F089P2473@202.177.16.121> <umjau5p8v1i6i8j21odlt3gsf1krja7uql@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 37aaad9323,100751ebd6393f6b X-Google-Attributes: gid37aaad9323,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Not Sure <fred1321123@gmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.education,az.politics,alt.california Subject: Re: EDITORIAL: Stinko de Mayo - School administrators need a lesson in right and wrong Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 17:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 115 Message-ID: <959bd7e9-fdf0-487b-9ce4-f17202cdb602@o14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> References: <Xns9D71AA6A71E946F089P2473@202.177.16.121> <umjau5p8v1i6i8j21odlt3gsf1krja7uql@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.228.88.39 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1273366150 17412 127.0.0.1 (9 May 2010 00:49:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 00:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.228.88.39; posting-account=fjT5ygoAAAC7xcwZFKdARMf07jnYoYSu User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)