Article View: misc.headlines
Article #1183Re: SCHOOL VOUCHERS -- Case for California Prop 174
From: Phil Ronzone
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1993 08:23
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1993 08:23
30 lines
2894 bytes
2894 bytes
In article <2be4jd$5tc@gap.cco.caltech.edu> hough@seismo.gps.caltech.edu (Susan Hough) writes:
>... the good teachers and caring principals didn't disappear;
>you just have a mass exodus of students whose parents _cared_
>about their education, and a mass influx of students whose
>parents, for the most part, don't. Or maybe some parents do
>care, but are unable to battle societal pressures that
>devalue education. Before you all flame me for being racist,
>let me finish-- there are enormous societal problems in our
>inner cities & we want to just dump them into a public
>education system and say, fix them. We sent our manufactoring
>jobs to Singapore and Mexico so that you & I can buy cheap
>consumer goods. We moved the affluent folks out to the
>suburbs, where you and I sheltered from deteriorating
>inner-city conditions. We offered up $4 minimum wage jobs and
>no affordable childcare for poor women. Then we sit back and
>wonder why inner city culture seems not to value human
>life...
Close to the mark. When we offer money (AFDC) to women to enable the natural
urge to have a baby, thus ensuring a financial incentive to NOT have a family
and to not have a family in the first place (no welfare check if married),
creating an "instant gratification ghetto male" system, what else do you
expect?
--
There are actually people that STILL believe Love Canal was some kind of
environmental disaster. Weird, eh?
These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<philCG29zF.8FD@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!philReferences:
<1993Nov4.125622.5035@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <philCG06qI.CJE@netcom.com> <2be4jd$5tc@gap.cco.caltech.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 104eff,934e36d75dcc5979,start X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public X-Google-Thread: f8421,934e36d75dcc5979,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf8421,public X-Google-Thread: fbd31,934e36d75dcc5979,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfbd31,public X-Google-Thread: 104158,934e36d75dcc5979,start X-Google-Attributes: gid104158,public X-Google-Thread: 10cc42,934e36d75dcc5979,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc42,public X-Google-Thread: 10a8a3,934e36d75dcc5979,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10a8a3,public X-Google-Thread: 1046d2,934e36d75dcc5979,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1046d2,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-11-06 02:29:16 PST Newsgroups: misc.headlines,talk.politics.misc,ca.politics,soc.couples,talk.religion.misc,bit.listserv.catholic,misc.kids Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!phil From: phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) Subject: Re: SCHOOL VOUCHERS -- Case for California Prop 174 Message-ID: <philCG29zF.8FD@netcom.com> Organization: Generally in favor of, but mostly random. References: <1993Nov4.125622.5035@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <philCG06qI.CJE@netcom.com> <2be4jd$5tc@gap.cco.caltech.edu> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1993 08:23:38 GMT Lines: 30