🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.headlines
Article #1435

Re: Overwhelming Firepower is Bad doctrine

#1435
From: RTO Trainer
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 03:03
62 lines
3199 bytes
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:31:23 GMT, Dharmananda <Nil@neph.net> wrote:

>remove underscore wrote:
>
>> On 22 Nov 2004 07:39:03 -0800, bill.white@us.army.mil (RTO Trainer)
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>Dharmananda <Nil@neph.net> wrote in message
>>>news:<2654961.IJh3aZTWvU@news.verizon.net>...
>>>> RTO Trainer wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Overwhelming Firepower is not current doctrine.
>>>> > 
>>>> > 1969 to 1974 is not current.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> OK, then what do you call the doctrine by which the attack on Fallujah
>>>> was fought?
>>>
>>>Not that the doctrinal name tells you much.
>>>
>>>MOUT.  Military Operations on Urban Terrain.
>> 
>> I already told him that.  Not that he listened of course.
>> 
>
>
>
>You're wrong, good buddy.  I looked up the doctrine.
>
>
>An interesting thing happened since then in the doctrine world.  The site
>featured by Google on this subject, originally at: 
>
>http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6453/
>
>was moved to this address, and effectively shut down:
>
>http://www.urbanoperations.com/
>
>
>�� "The Urban Operations Journal will be down until late February 2004 while
>the site undergoes a reorganization."
>
>
>Of course, this had nothing to do with the questions I raised.  That goes
>without saying.  Uh-huh.


LOL.  You flatter yourself.

That site was pretty dated before doctrine changed.  And it needed a
facelift.

---
COFFEE.EXE missing
Insert CUP and press ENTER to retry.

Signaleer  http://signaleer.blogspot.com
This Day in U.S. Military History  http://tdiumh.blogspot.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <j2a5q0dklie75km8cv3a1sddmqvoj1h6en@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc07.POSTED!19bedd6e!not-for-mail
References: <nkqgp0pcq32vfri0434kl9k1edpp1h6tsj@4ax.com> <cnap0u$4cm$1@news.chatlink.com> <1204636.UY531aNM1O@news.verizon.net> <ed856011.0411160727.5eca4c39@posting.google.com> <7152320.AaHMmCGklK@news.verizon.net> <cneiou$4s9$1@news.chatlink.com> <ed856011.0411171112.690ca95b@posting.google.com> <2654961.IJh3aZTWvU@news.verizon.net> <ed856011.0411220739.3d4a655e@posting.google.com> <shl4q056g2s6uuand6rqllacbef56bsmcc@4ax.com> <7759791.C0e8O9o76Z@news.verizon.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f8421,cdf0a02fb48ba498
X-Google-Thread: 10637b,cdf0a02fb48ba498
X-Google-Thread: 10dda6,cdf0a02fb48ba498
X-Google-Thread: 10c52e,cdf0a02fb48ba498
X-Google-Thread: f899c,cdf0a02fb48ba498
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8421,gid10637b,gid10dda6,gid10c52e,gidf899c,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc07.POSTED!19bedd6e!not-for-mail
From: RTO Trainer <bill.white@us.HOOAH.army.mil>
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,soc.veterans,alt.politics.usa.misc,hawaii.military,us.military
Subject: Re: Overwhelming Firepower is Bad doctrine
Organization: Lawdogs International
Message-ID: <j2a5q0dklie75km8cv3a1sddmqvoj1h6en@4ax.com>
References: <nkqgp0pcq32vfri0434kl9k1edpp1h6tsj@4ax.com> <cnap0u$4cm$1@news.chatlink.com> <1204636.UY531aNM1O@news.verizon.net> <ed856011.0411160727.5eca4c39@posting.google.com> <7152320.AaHMmCGklK@news.verizon.net> <cneiou$4s9$1@news.chatlink.com> <ed856011.0411171112.690ca95b@posting.google.com> <2654961.IJh3aZTWvU@news.verizon.net> <ed856011.0411220739.3d4a655e@posting.google.com> <shl4q056g2s6uuand6rqllacbef56bsmcc@4ax.com> <7759791.C0e8O9o76Z@news.verizon.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 62
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 03:03:44 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.12.166.5
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: trnddc07 1101179024 4.12.166.5 (Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:03:44 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:03:44 EST