🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <JIME.92Apr14103413@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> jime@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) writes:

# In article <1992Apr14.050948.24611@ennews.eas.asu.edu> makowsky@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (David Makowsky) writes:

# >   In article <JIME.92Apr13011518@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> jime@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) writes:

# >   # I guess your definition of terrorist act is different from most
# >   # people's.  The bombing of the King David Hotel is considered one of
# >   # the top terrorist actions of the era.

# >	   Very few people, even among those who mistakenly called the Irgun
# >   and Stern gangs terrorists, label that bombing as terrorist.  You
# >   obviously do not know even the most elementary details of that
# >   incident.
 
# Au contraire, Pierre.  The King David Hotel bombing was clearly a
# terrorist action.  A military action wouldn't have been preceded by a
# telephone call telling the people to get out.  (In this case, some may
# find it curious that a military action would have been more brutal,
# but c'est la guerre.)

	You are being an imbecile here.  Let us assume for the sake of
argument that the King David hotel bombing was not a military action.
That still does not make it a terrorist action.
--

David Makowsky
makowsky@enuxha.eas.asu.edu