Thread View: misc.headlines
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Jack Schmidling
Thu, 06 Aug 1992 16:50
ARF on Pollard
Author: Jack Schmidling
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 16:50
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 16:50
182 lines
10769 bytes
10769 bytes
Judging by the lame excuses for Pollard that still persist this morning, I
can only assume that this article did not get posted......
The "Friends of Pollard" are increasing the heat on the Justice Department to
release the notorious American traitor/Israeli spy, Jonathan Jay Pollard to
the "custody" of the Jewish State as a "token" of our "special relation" with
Israel. For those who have been mis-informed by the usual Israeli controlled
American media, I offer the following review of the case. I highly recommend
writing to your Congress-folk and insist that the traitor serve out his full
sentance.
"Aid Dollars Into the Pockets of Traitors"
The first nationwide shockwave that revealed Israel in an untrustworthy
posture emanated from a bizarre spy case, one of the most extraordinary in
American history. Jonathan Jay Pollard, Jr., 31, a Navy counterintelligence
analyst, was arrested in November 1985 for stealing classified documents as a
paid spy for Israel.
"We have a moral problem," a former official of Israel's principal spy
agency, Mossad, said when he learned of the arrest. "You can't take money of
the United States, and then use that money to buy information about that
country." Immoral or not, that is exactly what happened.
Before the arrest, the prosecution of Israel espionage had been taboo at
the FBI despite long-standing evidence that placed other federal employees
under suspicion. Like official at the State Department, where a senior
diplomat describes as "fantastic" the level of spying for Israel, FBI
officials habitually chose to look the other way, viewing pro-Israel
political influence as great enough to make attempted prosecution an exercise
in futility.
The FBI "knew of at least a dozen incidents in which American officials
transferred classified information to the Israelis," according to Raymond W.
Wannal,Jr, a former assistant director of the FBI. None was prosecuted. The
files gather dust.
John Davitt, a career official and former chief of the Justice
Department's internal security section, says: "When the Pollard case broke,
the general media and public perception was that this was the first time this
ever happened. No, that's not true at all." He adds that, during his tenure,
only the Soviet Union did more spying in the United States than Israel...
...After Pollard's arrest, embarrassed Israeli officials apologized for the
spying. They denounced it as an unauthorized "rogue" operation unknown by
anyone at cabinet level, and offered fullcooperation in a U.S. investigation.
They pledged that "those responsible will be brought to account."
Secretary of State George Shultz warmly accepted the apology, and the
State Department quickly attempted a cover-up. Shultz sent a *TEAM* headed by
legal adviser Abraham Sofaer, an ardent Zionist who maintains a home in
Israel, on a brief investigation there. Returning, Sofaer falsely reported
that Israel had provided "full access" to all persons with knowledge of the
facts. Within a month of the arrest, the department announced that Israel had
returned all stolen documents and that the United States had resumed sharing
intelligence with Israel "in all fields." The "matter," for the State
Department, was now closed.
Elsewhere, the "matter" was far from closed.
At the justice Departmen, U.S. Attorney Joseph E. diGenova pressed the
prosecution vigorously, and the case remained in the headlines for more than
three years, giving the American people frequent reason to question Israeli
cooperation and reliability. For example, the Pollard spy ring, far from
being a "rogue" operation, reported to the highest levels of the Israeli
government, including the Defense Ministry.
The "return" of stolen documents was a mockery. Of the thousands copied
by the Pollards, Israel bothered to return only 163 and, given its appetite
for top secrets, surely retained extra copies of these as well.
Instead of cooperating, Israel stonewalled attempts by U.S.Justice
Department to investigate the spy ring, refusing to permit key officials to
be interviewed either in the United States or Israel. One U.S official,
reflecting on the Sofaer mission , said, "The question is whether we got the
truth. Quite frankly we didn't."
The two Israelis who had the most prominent roles in the spy episode
were "brought to account" by the Israeli government in a curios way. Each won
higher position!...
...Weinberger wrote that the thievery caused "substantial and irrevocable
harm, "risking lives of U.S. agents and creating the danger that "U.S. combat
forces, wherever they are deployed in the world, could be unacceptably
endangered through successful exploitation of this data." He added that
Pollard had "both damaged and destroyed policies and national assets which
have taken many years, great effort and enormous national resources to
secure."
In the wake of the sentencing, Israel doubled Pollard's pay. The same
government that earlier denounced the affair as an unauthorized "rogue"
operation now deposits in Pollard's bank account $5,000 each month, assuring
the Pollards a comfortable life in Israel if he is released for good
behavior.
The imprisonment of the Pollards, U.S. officials believe, has not ended
Israeli espionage in the United States. Most of the secret information, as in
the past, is furnished by U.S citizens without compensation.
One official explains, "Mossad is the most active foreign intelligence
service on U.S. soil."...
For years Israel has been able to learn virtually every secret about
U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Reporter Charles Babcock of the
Washington Post, basing his estimate on a 1979 CIA report and recent
interviews with more than two dozen current or former U.S. intelligence
officials, concludes, "This remarkable intelligence harvest is provided
largely, not by paid agents, but by an unofficial network of sympathetic
American officials who work in the Pentagon, State Department, congressional
offices, the National Security Council, and even the U.S intelligence
agencies."
Meanwhile, Pollard became a cause celebre in both the United States and
Israel, where public protests against his sentence were organized and legal
defense funds raised. These funds were only a pittance, as the Israeli
government provided most of the $200,000 that American lawyers for the two
Pollards collected.
Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard professor and an attorney for Pollard, cited
Weinberger's assessment of U.S. security damage as the main reason why the
court ordered a life sentence, which Dershowitz considered excessive
and challenged Weinberger to prove that Pollard's thievery actually harmed
U.S security.
It was a limp challenge, because the public record already disclosed
overwhelming evidence of damage. Items stolen by Pollard included photographs
of security-related installations taken by high-flying U.S. surveillance
planes, sensitive data on laser technology and U.S. weapons, secret
information on naval forces, mines, and port facilities in the Middle East,
and the text of a large handbook nicknamed the "bible," which contained
strategies the U.S. Navy would use if attacked. The stolen documents were
voluminous enough, the court was told, to fill a box six by six by ten feet
in dimension!
Israel made quick use of the secrets. Information provided by Pollard
enabled Israeli warplanes to evade U.S. naval and air surveillance in the
Mediterranean during their October 1985 air strike against the Tunis
headquarters of the Palestine Liberation Organization. The precision-like
attack, first dismissed by President Ronald Reagan as "legitimate self-
defense, but later denounced by other administration officials, left nearly
one hundred dead, mostly Tunisian civilians, and the PLO headquarters in
shambles.
The gravest harm to U.S. interests occurred when the Soviet Union
acquired documents stolen by Pollard, perhaps all of them. The Soviets
acquired the data through two separate secret channels. Israel opened one of
them directly, offering U.S. secrets in an attempt to influence Moscow's
policy on Jewish emigration. Using some of these same contacts, the KGB,
Moscow's intelligence service, opened the other channel without the knowledge
of Israeli leadership, establishing a spy network within Mossad...
The reported diversion of stolen documents to Moscow made headlines in
nine newspapers but competing news services and television networks ignored
it. The New York Times and the Washington Post printed not a word...
...CIA officials agonize over the possibility that Pollard may have
compromised the way the United States gathers intelligence and enabled Israel
to crack secret U.S. codes.
The damage to Israel, too, is incalculable. AS the American people learn
the awesome extent of damage--especially the transfer of highly sensitive
data directly to the Kremlin--they inevitably will rethink America's Israeli
connection. Citizens, Jewish and non-Jewish alike, who, in their innocence,
believed the Jewish state to be honest, open, and trustworthy in all its U.S.
dealings are already expressing their outrage!...
...............
If you are tired of "learning" about American foreign policy from what is
effectively, Israeli controlled media, I highly recommend checking out the
Washington Report. A free sample copy is available by calling the American
Education Trust at:
(800) 368 5788
Tell 'em arf sent you.
You can also tune in to the Amateur Radio Forum (ARF)
Sunday evening at 9:PM Chicago time, 3950 KHZ, LSB.
....................................
Re: ARF on Pollard (Gander crash)
Author: Danny Keren
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 19:59
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 19:59
11 lines
976 bytes
976 bytes
Just a short time ago, there was a program on the Discovery channel linking the "Islamic Jihad" organization to the explosion of a US plane over Gander, New-Foundland, in 1985. 256 American soldiers were killed. An article on this also appeared in an April 1992 issue of "TIME". This really has nothing to do with Pollard. Just makes me wonder why Schmidling never found it important enough to post about this. Maybe the "Spotlight" doesn't write about it, eh, Arfie? -Danny Keren.
Re: ARF on Pollard
Author: Adam Shostack
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 20:18
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 20:18
50 lines
2385 bytes
2385 bytes
In article <1992Aug6.165015.24455@ddsw1.mcs.com> arf@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Jack Schmidling) writes: > Judging by the lame excuses for Pollard that still persist this morning, I > can only assume that this article did not get posted...... No, Arf, it did get posted, just ignored. Would you like me to set up a kill file that will mail you a copy of each article you post, so you know its gotten out? We all saw it, just ignored it, as its just another rehash of the old "double loyalties" canard. Specific examples include: > officials, concludes, "This remarkable intelligence harvest is provided > largely, not by paid agents, but by an unofficial network of sympathetic > American officials who work in the Pentagon, State Department, congressional > offices, the National Security Council, and even the U.S intelligence > agencies." Clearly, these "symapthetic officials are all Jews confused about who they pledged alleigence to. > The FBI "knew of at least a dozen incidents in which American officials > transferred classified information to the Israelis," according to Raymond W. > Wannal,Jr, a former assistant director of the FBI. None was prosecuted. The > files gather dust. I know of at least 100 such incedents. They are provided for by Intelegence sharing agreements. Nice twisting of his words. > > The imprisonment of the Pollards, U.S. officials believe, has not ended > Israeli espionage in the United States. Most of the secret information, as in > the past, is furnished by U.S citizens without compensation. Yet more unattributed double-loyalty accusations. Yawn. We all saw your Barf, arf. Now leave talk.politics.mideast like you promised. Adam Shostack adam@das.harvard.edu What a terrible thing to have lost one's .sig. Or not to have a .sig at all. How true that is.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads