🚀 go-pugleaf

On 04-10-2003 18:06, in article
peCfb.1328$Qy2.420@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Murray Cooper"
<chuck@up.chuck> wrote:

> Eric Johnson wrote:
> 
>> On 04-10-2003 16:17, in article 8hltnvkg8t2sm5gptt0vb04urff3kpoac2@4ax.com,
>> "Lou Scannon" <scannon@lmountain.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 3 Oct 2003 15:37:11 -0700, tallgrassprairie@earthlink.net
>>> (Tallgrass) wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> "JMartin" <antares1947@comwares.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:<blifni$dgi$0@12.166.20.62>...
>>>> 
>>>>> When I was a meter reader, I had a truck that only got AM radio.  I was
>>>>> stuck with either a fuzzy country station or KFI out of LA.  I usually
>>>>> chose
>>>>> KFI.
>>>>> 
>>>>> When Rush Limbaugh came on, I either turned it off or made do with the
>>>>> country station.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's a shame that I have to even see his name in misc.rural.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jena
>>>> 
>>>> Now, at least, we know what has fueled his vitriolic opinions all this
>>>> time....he was out of narcotics!!
>>>> 
>>>> Linda H.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Think he'll want to live by his own words?
>>> 
>>> Rush Oct. 5, 1995,
>>> 
>>> "if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be
>>> accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up."
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> No. He or the situation will be different in some concrete way as to let him
>> slip out.
>> However, if the right loses rush as a force in their favor, things would
>> change in favor of democrats.
>> 
>> He will -never- accept, even if all is true which I sincerely doubt(4000+
>> pills in a 10 day period), that he is anything like a common pot smoker.
> 
> Of course he won't!  He has a completely distorted view
> of what a pot smoker is.  He still obviously clings to
> the sort of hysterical imagery portrayed in _Reefer
> Madness_.
> 
> And "folks", it doesn't make a bit of difference.
> Short of a knife with Nicole Simpson's blood on it
> being found in Limbaugh's closet, the blind-faith,
> true-believing, stoooooopid dildo-heads will never
> desert him.  "Folks":  that kind of blind faith is not
> admirable.
> 


Oh, I disagree. If these charges are even substantially true, his position
in Americana is shattered. His show may remain, but he will no longer be
credible.

EJ