🚀 go-pugleaf

Eric Johnson wrote:

> On 04-10-2003 18:06, in article
> peCfb.1328$Qy2.420@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Murray Cooper"
> <chuck@up.chuck> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Eric Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On 04-10-2003 16:17, in article 8hltnvkg8t2sm5gptt0vb04urff3kpoac2@4ax.com,
>>>"Lou Scannon" <scannon@lmountain.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On 3 Oct 2003 15:37:11 -0700, tallgrassprairie@earthlink.net
>>>>(Tallgrass) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"JMartin" <antares1947@comwares.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:<blifni$dgi$0@12.166.20.62>...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>When I was a meter reader, I had a truck that only got AM radio.  I was
>>>>>>stuck with either a fuzzy country station or KFI out of LA.  I usually
>>>>>>chose
>>>>>>KFI.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>When Rush Limbaugh came on, I either turned it off or made do with the
>>>>>>country station.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's a shame that I have to even see his name in misc.rural.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jena
>>>>>
>>>>>Now, at least, we know what has fueled his vitriolic opinions all this
>>>>>time....he was out of narcotics!!
>>>>>
>>>>>Linda H.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Think he'll want to live by his own words?
>>>>
>>>>Rush Oct. 5, 1995,
>>>>
>>>>"if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be
>>>>accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up."
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>No. He or the situation will be different in some concrete way as to let him
>>>slip out.
>>>However, if the right loses rush as a force in their favor, things would
>>>change in favor of democrats.
>>>
>>>He will -never- accept, even if all is true which I sincerely doubt(4000+
>>>pills in a 10 day period), that he is anything like a common pot smoker.
>>
>>Of course he won't!  He has a completely distorted view
>>of what a pot smoker is.  He still obviously clings to
>>the sort of hysterical imagery portrayed in _Reefer
>>Madness_.
>>
>>And "folks", it doesn't make a bit of difference.
>>Short of a knife with Nicole Simpson's blood on it
>>being found in Limbaugh's closet, the blind-faith,
>>true-believing, stoooooopid dildo-heads will never
>>desert him.  "Folks":  that kind of blind faith is not
>>admirable.
>>
> 
> 
> 
> Oh, I disagree. If these charges are even substantially true, his position
> in Americana is shattered. His show may remain, but he will no longer be
> credible.

Nope.  Limbaugh's audience is divided into two parts:

  - people who tune in to see what outrageous thing the
    shitbag is saying most recently

  - blind-faith, true-believing mega-dildoheads

The mega-dildoheads will never desert him.

You know who the mega-dildoheads are, right?  They're 
the ones, invariably with a southern or at least rural 
accent, who, when they finally come on the air, say: 
"Oh, Ruuuuuush!  <gyuk-gyuk-gyuk>  It izzz an HON-or to 
SPEEEEEEEK with you! <gyuk-gyuk-gyuk>"  You can 
practically see Limbaugh beaming right through the 
radio when those morons say that.