Article View: misc.writing
Article #826Re: Semantics of "to be"
From: Rheal Nadeau
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 15:28
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 15:28
25 lines
1515 bytes
1515 bytes
In article <16047@mindlink.bc.ca> Alan_Barclay@mindlink.bc.ca (Alan Barclay) writes: >"There was a cat on the table" > >vs. > >"The cat sprawled on the table." > >Notice that the first sentence is passive and the second, active. "Was" is >an element in many passive constructions. For that reason alone, hunting and >rewriting is a good idea. (P.S. could I write this paragraph without using >"is?" :) ) Could you write this without "is"? How about: Notice that the sentence now uses an active rather than a passive voice. Many passive constructions use "was". For that reason alone, hunting and rewriting yields stronger sentences. Done as a quick exercise only - there is still room for improvement (uh, make that, these sentences could still be improved). Now, the capital question - are my alternate versions really an improvement as far as the reader is concerned? The Rhealist - Rheal Nadeau - nadeau@bnr.ca - Speaking only for myself
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct6.152841.13733@bcrka451.bnr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!convex!news.utdallas.edu!corpgate!bnrgate!bcrka451!cadnewsReferences:
<16047@mindlink.bc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.writing Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!convex!news.utdallas.edu!corpgate!bnrgate!bcrka451!cadnews From: nadeau@bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau) Subject: Re: Semantics of "to be" Message-ID: <1992Oct6.152841.13733@bcrka451.bnr.ca> Sender: 5E00 Corkstown News Server Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa, Canada References: <16047@mindlink.bc.ca> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 15:28:41 GMT Lines: 25