🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.writing
Article #826

Re: Semantics of "to be"

#826
From: Rheal Nadeau
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 15:28
25 lines
1515 bytes
In article <16047@mindlink.bc.ca> Alan_Barclay@mindlink.bc.ca (Alan Barclay) writes:
>"There was a cat on the table"
>
>vs.
>
>"The cat sprawled on the table."
>
>Notice that the first sentence is passive and the second, active.  "Was" is
>an element in many passive constructions.  For that reason alone, hunting and
>rewriting is a good idea.  (P.S. could I write this paragraph without using
>"is?" :) )

Could you write this without "is"?  How about:

   Notice that the sentence now uses an active rather than a passive
   voice.  Many passive constructions use "was".  For that reason
   alone, hunting and rewriting yields stronger sentences.

Done as a quick exercise only - there is still room for improvement
(uh, make that, these sentences could still be improved).

Now, the capital question - are my alternate versions really an
improvement as far as the reader is concerned?

The Rhealist - Rheal Nadeau - nadeau@bnr.ca - Speaking only for myself
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Oct6.152841.13733@bcrka451.bnr.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!convex!news.utdallas.edu!corpgate!bnrgate!bcrka451!cadnews
References: <16047@mindlink.bc.ca>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.writing
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!convex!news.utdallas.edu!corpgate!bnrgate!bcrka451!cadnews
From: nadeau@bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau)
Subject: Re: Semantics of "to be"
Message-ID: <1992Oct6.152841.13733@bcrka451.bnr.ca>
Sender: 5E00 Corkstown News Server
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa, Canada
References: <16047@mindlink.bc.ca>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 15:28:41 GMT
Lines: 25