🚀 go-pugleaf

burke@no.mail (R J Burke) wrote in message news:<L1KJ3JGN37276.9682407407@anonymous.poster>...
> .....Part II....
> 
> What we are discussing is very simple: the Jews are a class
> fighting to dominate other classes, just as Benjamin Stein saw in
> his report on the TV Weltanschauung, The View from Sunset Boulevard.
> Jew Stein, like Jew Michael Levin (Feminism and Freedom) and Jew
> Paul Gottfried, will never name his people as that class, pointing
> to "writers and producers," "feminists," and "neoconservatives." (It
> is really truly amazing the way that Jews are able to camouflage
> their interests, always presenting their specific goal as a general
> good, and that their terms are tacitly accepted in their opponents'
> rhetoric. It's like we all are under contract to agree that the Jews
> aren't a group and don't have any specific interests and certainly
> don't work to advance those interests and even if they do, they
> aren't in conflict with ours.)  
> 
> But notice that on the flip side, the opposite conditions obtain:
> Jews always attack their opponents by class (right-wing Christian
> extremists, racist haters, Arabs), lingering lovingly on the
> specific interests of their undifferentiated opponents; always
> forestalling counter-arguments as "anti-Semitism" driven by the only
> motive Jews ever allow their opponents -- all together now --
> "hate."
> 
> The Jews can only get away with this clever I-criticize-you-and-you
> criticize-that-bag-of- flour-over-there setup because they exert
> extraordinary control over television and newspapers. And their
> backup line of defense, of course, is to denounce anyone who notices
> the strategies behind their tactics as an anti-Semitic
> conspiracymonger. This is a second aspect of what the 'ZOG'-minded
> are pointing to.
> 
> Stein is writing about the class of TV writers and producers;
> Gottfried is writing about neoconservatives; Levin is writing about
> feminists. All of them mean Jews, none of them can afford to say it.
> When you become a Jew, it's almost as though you have to sign a
> sheet saying you will either avoid mentioning negative Jewish
> characteristics or -- pace Marx and Freud -- reinterpret specific,
> offensive Jewish behaviors or patterns as generically human: i.e.,
> repression, or characteristic of an exploited class. (An excellent
> book, The Ordeal of Civility, by John Murray Cuddihy, covers this
> topic in depth.) The one thing none of these rightist Jews wants is
> a civilized White society where Jews are nonexistent. Or ghettoized.
> Or looked down on socially. Or in which you are free to speak and
> write and talk about Jews as specific people who act, look and think
> in generalizable ways. Jews may be physically ugly duplicitous
> socialist troublemakers, but they don't want you saying that. 
> 
> They will propagandize through the schools and TV until you are
> practically unable to notice it because the whole context in which
> you might make such an observation has been destroyed. They will
> make hard to find the few books that dare discuss it. (Just try
> finding Cuddihy's book.) History is nothing but a propaganda tool to
> them. In living memory they were kept out of the better hotels and
> clubs and colleges, and since treatment of the Jews, to Jews, is the
> true measure of civilization, any time they were legally or socially
> treated as other than the God-sent gift they present themselves
> (that is, all history up until about fifty years ago) must be
> falsified into Dark Ages (Jews out of power) preceding today's
> Enlightened Age (Jews running the show). Let alone the ghettoes of
> old Europe, these people are capable of portraying the fifties in
> America as some sort of racist hellhole, saved only through heroic
> Blacks led by saintly Jews in the name of civil rights or federal
> tyranny, if you prefer your descriptions accurate. What is clear to
> every Jew seems to be unclear to most White Americans, especially
> those on the right who ought to know better: this is a war of
> classes, a war for power and dominance between a small but smart and
> well-positioned ethnic group and the vast majority of civilzed White
> people. The Jews instinctively recognize this battle, feel it in
> their blood, and are fighting hard for their side. Most on our side
> aren't even aware a war is going on.
> 
> 
> It might have been expected that the loss of power and funding would
> have resulted in the radicalization of the traditional right, at
> least to the point of open talk about taking the American right back
> from the Jews. There was very little of such talk, none of it open
> -- at least among those with one eye on "respectability," that ever
> leftward moving boundary observed by fools.
> 
> What we still see on the right in the year 2000 are leading non-
> Jewish right-wing Whites couching what they know to be racial
> arguments in regional or race-neutral terms. Sam Francis speaks of
> Middle American Revolutionaries. He means Whites, but he's afraid to
> come out and say it. Of course, he gets called racist just the same.
> And he got fired from the neocon Washington Times just the same. But
> Jews, to him, are just people with a different religion, and he can
> still find a way to fit minorities into that Middle American
> revolution.
> 
> Then there are the various Southern separatist groups. All are
> carefully non-racial. All get accused of being racist. All fail to
> draw the correct conclusion. It is amusing in a sick and
> increasingly irritating way. Is there nobody left who can think
> clearly and isn't afraid to voice his conclusions publicly? No, the
> Southern Semitically Correct separatists present as sorry a face as
> they always do. Always trying for that elusive respectability,
> always failing to achieve it, and always losing the few -- and
> merely symbolic -- battles they do engage in. For people who brag
> incessantly "on" their heroic Confederate ancestors, they show
> little courage and less intelligence. I'll say it again, a little
> louder now, so Johnny Reb can hear me: 
> 
> THERE IS NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS. IT DOES YOU NO GOOD
> TO BE OR PRETEND TO BE NON- RACIST. YOU ARE THREATENED AS A
> GROUP, BY A GROUP, AND YOU'D BETTER GET THOSE GROUPS STRAIGHT
> IN YOUR HEAD TO HAVE ANY HOPE OF PRESERVING THE LAND AND
> PEOPLE YOU LOVE.
> 
> 
> How many times does the right have to learn that the media really is
> controlled by Jews, by intimidation where not by ownership; that
> Jews really are leftist; and that anyone preaching anything remotely
> resembling White pride gets treated like a human showing emotion in
> Invasion of the Body Snatchers (that is, squawked at and pointed out
> to the cops by the aliens who are taking over the planet) -- so that
> he might as well oppose the Jew's anti-White hatred openly. You
> can't win where the other guy defines the terms, sets the labels,
> interprets the law. You must oppose him openly, directly, explicity
> and give him no quarter. 
> 
> 
> The funny thing is that once you say, Yes, I am a racist. Just like
> George Washington. And you are a White-hating Jew -- the poison is
> drawn. They have set the terms of this political game we all play,
> and only by refusing to play do we stand a chance of winning. It is
> utmost foolishness, as anybody who has published conservative
> articles anywhere in the world will tell you, to try to escape the
> racist tag. You can't, and in any case it ain't a meaningful word,
> people -- it's just a way to smear and discredit you. Fight the
> smearers and discrediters directly, refuse to play on their terms.
> Love and fairness no more conquer hate than they conquer bullets.
> Prefixing your conservative arguments with "I'm not a racist,
> but..." and expecting to achieve your political goals is like one of
> those African rebel guerillas smearing himself with magical pig
> grease thinking it will stop bullets.
> 
> 
> Then you've got the libertarians, trying to get government off our
> backs without any recourse to racial explanations or group interests
> in explaining human behavior. Trying to understand the world one
> person at a time. Some of these libertarians are products of Silicon
> Valley, and to the extent they philosophize, they are Randian
> individualists. They believe in free trade and free movement of
> peoples, and make no distinctions between them. Libertarians seem to
> instinctively turn away from any historical recognition of the
> circumstances under which the freedoms they demand were actually
> realized. Even their few (and in many ways impressive) intellectuals
> who are interested in history tend to fall in line with the the
> politically safe Jewish lie about the non-racial aspect of our
> founding, building their future utopias in that tired old,
> misunderstood, misrepresented "all men are created equal."
> Politically, libertarians are laughable, beyond their useful ability
> to supply policy papers. Imagine a whole bunch of computer geeks and
> economics professors marching on Washington under the fear-inspiring
> banner of "Me!" Now there's an Army even our heroic neo-Confederates
> could take! Libertarians maybe never will realize that, again I
> yell, 
> 
> BLOOD AND RACE ARE WHAT MOVE PEOPLE, NOT THE RIGHT TO SMOKE
> DOOBIES AND BUGGER YOUR BOYFRIEND. NOT EVEN ECONOMICS. 
> 
> Am I really the only idiot to notice that when Whites ruled America,
> White people were free? And that when Jews and Blacks rule America,
> they're slaves? But most "right-wing" libertarians would rather
> support a minimum wage hike than acknowledge this simple historical
> fact. They are too rationalist in temperament, too much like our
> liberal dictators. Too in love with their idea of people-as-
> individuals-in-the-low-tax-multicultural-utopia-of-tomorrow to pay
> attention to street-level political and historical reality.
> 
> Many of us want individual liberty, but it only obtains under
> certain circumstances. There sure doesn't seem to be much of it
> around in these days of "civil rights" for everybody except the
> people who created the idea of 'em in the first place. If there's
> anything that gives the lie to what passes for "conservatism" these
> days, it's right here: Genuine civil rights -- association,
> property, speech, self-defense -- were much better protected in the
> days before the prating Jews and their colored parasite minions rose
> to the fore. Yet recognition of the race-based nature of practical,
> effective, genuine freedom will get you kicked out of the
> Libertarian party faster than you can say Don't Do Drugs!
> 
> Libertarians take one aspect of looking at the world and inflate it
> into the entire cosmos. This is their built-in bias. When you
> combine it with their standard right-wing fear of crossing the
> Semitical Correctness line, you have a second hurdle between them
> and racialism. The conservative Christians share these political
> flaws. Their concern is not for the race or the group, but for the
> salvation of the individual soul. Of course, since in years past the
> Good Book has been used to support virtually every position under
> the sun including communism, there is a bit more hope for their
> conversion on the racial issue, should the powers that be change. TV
> Christians have proven able adopters of the Semitically Correct
> line. Israel is good and racialism is bad. That's the message
> they're getting from New York, and that's the message Pat Robertson
> is putting out to rural North Carolina. 
> 
> The libertarians have their hated parties, but these are always
> anonymous "bureaucrats" or "statists," or "socialists" -- never
> anyone you can actually get your hands on. Same with the Christian
> conservatives. They are the equivalent of the libertarians in that
> the former are excellent at certain types of economic reasoning (Why
> We Should Privatize Trash Collection) while the Christians retain
> solid moral and character- development advice. They are both good on
> the small-picture stuff. But neither group can take a realistic look
> at the general; they are both concerned about saving Heaven or
> Liberty one soul at a time. They both simply refuse to make
> necessary generalizations. Christians, again like Libertarians,
> invariably throw their opprobrium on carefully generic targets:
> Atheists, secular humanists (gays are the one exception, and even
> here they say "Hate the sinner, not the sin," as though that doesn't
> conflict with their doctrine of free will). A Jew or a black or a
> Mexican is a vivid image, immediately recognizable. The abstractions
> countered by the Christians and the libertarians are creatures that
> nobody would recognize on a public street. They are fighting
> abstactly against abstractions, instead of coherently for something
> concrete.
> 
> Never do the Christians go after the Jews who are killing their
> doctrines; never do they speak the name of their real enemy despite
> the spittingly obscene provocations to which he has subjected them.
> This is why, with tens of millions in numerical advantage, the
> Christians aren't even masters of the civilization they created. In
> fact, much of the leadership class of the Christians has become so
> enthralled with Jewish ideas that now the church will bend any which
> way the Jews require, whether it's removing the Commandments from
> the classroom the way the Jew judge and Jew-created and -run ACLU
> tell them to, or rewriting history to avoid the fact that Jews
> condemned their own Savior to die (as in the revised [read:
> Semitically Correct] Passion Plays)! They may think they are only
> turning the other cheek, but self-abasing worms is what these new
> Christians truly are. 
> 
> 
> Recently Bush's first national campaign ad aired. It shows him at a
> school surrounded by little black and brown kids, all well on their
> way to becoming the computer programmers and doctors and lawyers and
> Republicans of tomorrow. It seems the GOP has made up its mind which
> way it's going. It's everyvato's party; down with the homies, too.
> Make any show that persuades in order to capture power. The old
> Clinton strategy. After all, reality is that waves of wets wash over
> the border every night, and at some point they and their kids will
> vote. The bulk White population is fading, and the core demographic
> supporting conservative principles simply won't be there to swing a
> presidential election in another ten years. Even Jew-genuflecting
> National Review has noticed this Californication of America, as has
> been termed in a different context. But sucking up to the powers
> that be, angling for a spot, doing what he's told, is something the
> middle-manager mind that makes up the Republican ranks well
> understands. Ya got to roll with the punches, ya know?
> 
> White man, you have to decide. If you choose not to decide, you
> still have made a choice, to make a phrase. You can pull a Christian
> Scientist, and pretend that that brown spot on our national chest
> will just go away if we think positive thoughts long enough, refuse
> to acknowledge it. But it won't. Those coloreds swamping the border,
> those grasping welfare niggers, those lying Jewish press
> manipulators won't disappear of their own accord. Twenty years from
> now, George Bush-Brown will be president, and all the things you
> fear today -- your kids blood-libeled at school; yourself
> discriminated against on the job; your taxes higher than ever; your
> wife subject to insults, rape or assault; your big cities gang-
> dominated; your small cities dominated by nigger "music" and
> clothing pollution; your guns outlawed; your political opinions
> criminalized; your TV louder and more intrusive and hateful -- will
> be worse. As Paul Gottfried shows, but doesn't tell, the same Jews
> that have made the present possible are working hard to make this
> future inevitable. But there is still a window of opportunity. But
> only if you recognize that we -- you and I and the others reading
> this -- are part of the White race, share interests, and must band
> together. And that, politically, culturally and socially, to achieve
> a civilized future, there is
> 
> NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS!
> 
> http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/index5.htm

FYI

John