🚀 go-pugleaf

Paul Kneisel <tallpaul@nyct.net> wrote in message news:<LNCSH2CL37275.8942708333@anonymous.poster>...
> The National Alliance web site has been very busy
> since September 11, 2001. Do not give up and please
> be assured; all links are functioning.
> 
> American Dissident Voices Internet Radio
> http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/
> 
> WORLDWIDE ON SHORTWAVE:
> 
> Saturday 6:00pm Eastern Time
> (Saturday 23:00 UTC)
> ..............5.085 and 6.890 MHz via WWFV
> 
> Saturday 11:00pm Eastern Time
> (Sunday 4:00 UTC)
> ..............5.085 and 6.890 MHz via WWFV
> 
> Free Speech
> http://www.natvan.com/free-speech
> 
> Who Rules America
> http://www.natvan.com/who-rules-america
> 
> What is the National Alliance
> http://www.natvan.com/what-is-na
> 
> American Dissident Voices:
> Transcripts
> http://www.natvan.com/american-dissident-voices
> Broadcast Schedule
> http://www.natvan.com/radio-schedule
> Internet Radio
> http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio
> Text
> http://www.natvan.com/pub
> 
> National Vanguard Magazine
> http://www.natvan.com/national-vanguard
> 
> Catalog
> http://www.natvan.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_main.html
> 
> National Alliance in America
> http://www.natvan.com/index.html
> 
> National Alliance in Canada
> New webpage: http://www.natall.ca
> 
> Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds
> http://www.natvan.com/e-book.html
> A new book about Dr. William Pierce and the National Alliance
> has been published on the Internet and is now available from
> the e-book division of Barnes and Noble, the world's biggest
> retail bookseller.
> 
> Now to today's informative talk.
> 
> American Dissident Voices Broadcast of January 19, 2002
> 
> The Culture of Lies
> By Dr. William Pierce
> 
> Hello!
> 
> A time-honored saying is , "All is fair in love and war." Certainly, it
> seems a reasonable saying and one in accord with Nature. It expresses
> the fact that when at war even otherwise honorable men resort to
> trickery, deceit, and outright lying. In a strictly personal conflict a
> man may feel obliged by his sense of honor to be truthful; at least, it
> used to be that way before we got so much democracy and
> multiculturalism, and we still had some understanding of the concept of
> personal honor. But when a nation or a race is at war, and survival
> depends upon victory -- or at least, upon avoiding defeat -- a man must
> think of more than his personal honor; he must put the survival of his
> people above all else, and he must do whatever is necessary to win.
> 
> It's stretching things a bit, however, when we lie in order to make our
> job of beating up someone much smaller and weaker a little easier for
> us. When our government lies not because it's a matter of national
> survival but just for the sake of convenience, that should be troubling
> for all of us. That's the case of our propaganda war in Afghanistan, for
> example. We drop leaflets with doctored photographs and lies all over
> the place, in order to turn the people against their former Taliban
> leaders and Osama bin Laden. We should be saying simply, "We're coming
> for you, Osama bin Laden, and we'll get you." Instead, we try to make
> our job easier by lying outrageously.
> 
> Well, lying is the way of democrats and multiculturalists -- and that
> includes Republicans -- but I question whether or not it really makes
> our job easier. We air-dropped leaflets on Afghanistan with a phony
> photograph of Osama bin Laden wearing a Western suit and with his beard
> shaved and his hair cut short and announced that he had given up the
> fight so that he could escape to a life of luxury and ease in the West.
> That really didn't fool anyone, and it was a completely unnecessary lie.
> Then a little later Mr. Bush produced a video tape that he claimed had
> been found in an al-Quaida hideout and showed Osama bin Laden
> confessing, in effect, to the September 11 attack. Should we be
> surprised when Muslims all over the Middle East don't believe Bush and
> denounce the video tape as phony?
> 
> Actually, I believe it very likely that Osama bin Laden was behind the
> September 11 attack, and I think most Muslims believe that too. But I
> and a lot of other people are very skeptical about Mr. Bush's very
> convenient video tape. Perhaps it's genuine, but I'm not inclined to
> believe that just because George Bush or Donald Rumsfeld or any other
> lying politician says it is.
> 
> The fact is that politicians are so accustomed to lying about everything
> that they don't even stop to consider the consequences of their lies. If
> a lie seems more convenient than the truth at any moment, they lie --
> and not just to little people they're beating up at the moment. American
> politicians will lie just as readily to their fellow Americans as they
> will to Afghans or Pakistanis. And one can hardly blame them, because
> the American people have come to expect it of them and don't seem to
> hold it against them. Teddy Kennedy murdered his girlfriend Joann
> Kopechne and lied outrageously about it, and yet he's still in the U.S.
> Senate today. Bill Clinton lied outrageously about nearly everything,
> and the voters reelected him.
> 
> And as I said, it's not just Democratic politicians. George Bush may not
> be as skillful a liar as Bill Clinton, but he's just as much a liar.
> That's the democratic way -- with a small "d." We live in a culture of
> lies, a culture shaped for us by the controlled mass media, in which
> lying not only is acceptable, it is required whenever it helps the cause
> of Political Correctness. Consider the current twittering in New York
> about the 19-foot bronze statue being erected in honor of the city's
> firemen. The statue is based on a news photograph of three New York
> firemen raising an American flag, Iwo Jima style, on a mound of rubble
> at the site of the former World Trade Center. The three firemen who
> raised the flag are all White men, as are 94 per cent of New York City's
> firemen, and the Whiteness of the firemen raising the flag can be seen
> quite clearly in the news photograph.
> 
> Well, that's a Politically Inconvenient fact, and so the 19-foot statue
> based on the photograph will show one Negro fireman, one mestizo
> fireman, and one White fireman raising the flag. Naturally, the White
> firemen who actually raised the flag on the rubble were not happy when
> they saw the multicultural model for the statue, and neither were many
> of their fellow White firemen.
> 
> Tough luck. I suspect that the media bosses, the politicians, and the
> Jewish businessmen who favor the multicultural statue will have their
> way, and groups of schoolchildren who are shown the statue will be told
> that it's an actual depiction of the flag-raising. I'm surprised they
> didn't include a female fireman and an Asian fireman helping to raise
> the flag and show a couple of gay firemen fondling each other in the
> background.
> 
> Perhaps it's unfair of me to put too much blame on politicians and
> Jewish businessmen for this sort of lying and distortion of reality for
> the sake of Political Correctness. Gentile businessmen seem about as
> willing to lie as Jewish businessmen. Jesse Jackson, the Black rabble
> rouser, con man, and extortionist whose empire seems to be collapsing
> now, made a very good living for many years by persuading businessmen --
> most of them Gentiles -- to lie about race for him. With the Jewish
> media backing him, Jackson would threaten White businessmen with Black
> boycotts unless they multiculturalized their operations to his
> satisfaction -- and kicked in a nice, big payoff to Jesse himself. Jesse
> would demand that the White businessmen hire Black executives, picture
> Blacks in their advertising, and subcontract to Black-owned businesses.
> 
> Instead of standing up to Jackson and calling him an extortionist,
> virtually all of the White businessmen decided it would be cheaper to
> pay him off, make the changes in personnel and advertising and
> subcontracting he demanded, and pretend that they liked it. They paid
> for advertising showing White women cuddling up to Black men in order to
> please Jesse and pretended that they were doing this of their own free
> will. They wanted everyone to know that they were on the multicultural
> bandwagon. To me, this is at least as bad as the sort of lying the
> politicians do.
> 
> And the Gentile academics and publicists are just as crooked these days.
> There was a bit of nervous twittering among academic historians last
> month when a supposedly scholarly study of firearms ownership in
> 18th-century America by an Emory University history professor, Michael
> Bellesiles, turned out to be fraudulent. Bellesiles claimed to have
> studied thousands of 18th-century probate records and found that very
> few American families -- fewer than 10 per cent -- actually owned
> firearms in the 18th century; therefore, the legislators who wrote the
> Second Amendment obviously didn't intend to guarantee the right of
> individuals to keep and bear arms, just militias. Well, that pleased the
> nutcase feminist gun-control crowd, but as it turned out, Bellesiles had
> faked it. Professional historians professed embarrassment and outrage
> over Bellesiles' chicanery, but what Bellesiles did in trying to scuttle
> the Second Amendment is quite innocuous compared to the fraud committed
> by thousands of other professional historians, who don't have to worry
> about being called to account for their deceit.
> 
> I'm talking about the historians of the Second World War and related
> subjects, such as the so-called "Holocaust." Every academic historian
> worth his salt understands that nearly all the histories of the Second
> World War are fraudulent through commission, omission, or both, yet
> almost none of these historians will challenge the fraud in the way
> Bellesiles' work has been challenged. Why is that?
> 
> The reason is that Jews as a whole have a vested interest in the
> fraudulent version of the war and of the "Holocaust." Anyone who
> questions even the smallest detail of the fraud is attacked viciously as
> a -- quote -- "Holocaust denier" or a -- quote -- "Nazi sympathizer." In
> the case of gun control, nearly all Jews are for it, but they don't have
> the vested interest in it that they have in the "Holocaust" and a number
> of other myths about the Second World War. So it is still permissible to
> be objective in writing about the history of firearms ownership in
> America -- but it is not permissible to write or teach anything contrary
> to revealed dogma about the Second World War. Even the historians who
> aren't partisans of the Jews and who don't want to lie don't have the
> courage to be truthful.
> 
> Imagine that a history professor is teaching his students 20th-century
> history, and to avoid violating any taboos he teaches the approved,
> "kosher" version. He teaches that in the years prior to the Second World
> War the Germans wanted the Jews out of Germany, but he doesn't explain
> why. He doesn't talk about what the Jewish commissars were doing to
> Russians and Ukrainians in the Soviet death camps. He doesn't mention
> the murder of millions of kulaks by the communists, and he doesn't
> mention the extraordinarily high percentage of Jews in the Soviet
> bureaucracy and in the Soviet secret police and among the administrators
> of the Soviet death camps. He doesn't tell his students that while these
> things were kept quiet by the media in the United States, the media in
> Germany talked openly about them, and the German people were aware of
> how the Jews had turned on the helpless Gentiles under communist rule
> and butchered them by the millions. He leaves his students with the
> impression that the German desire to get the Jews out of Germany was
> entirely irrational or was based on jealousy of Jewish wealth and
> success.
> 
> When he talks about the year preceding Pearl Harbor, he is not likely to
> mention that the Roosevelt government was so hot to get the United
> States involved in the war against Germany at the behest of the Jews
> that the United States was waging undeclared war against Germany in the
> Atlantic, hoping for an "incident" that could be used as a pretext for
> full-scale hostilities, but that the German Navy was under strict orders
> not to respond to U.S. provocations, or that when the Pearl Harbor
> attack came it was more of a surprise to the Germans than it was to the
> war party in the Roosevelt government, which previously had broken the
> Japanese naval code. He leaves his students with the impression that the
> United States wanted only peace, and the Germans wanted only to wage war
> against us in their mad campaign to conquer the world.
> 
> When he talks about the behavior of the various combatants during the
> war, he is likely to follow the Jewish party line and paint the Germans
> as barbarians who committed more atrocities than anyone else, and to
> paint the Jews as the principal victims of the war. He may not feel
> obliged to repeat all of the more fanciful Jewish lies, such as Jews
> being skinned by the Germans to make lampshades and then boiled down to
> make soap, but he certainly will not describe these lies for what they
> are, and he will not challenge the central myth of "six million"
> innocent, blameless Jews killed in "gas ovens" by the wicked Nazis. He
> will skim lightly over the genocide committed by the Soviets against the
> Germans, the Poles, the Balts, and other nationalities during and after
> the war, and he will not even hint at the leading role played by the
> Jews in this genocide. He is likely to leave his students believing the
> oft-repeated lie that the so-called "Holocaust" was the greatest crime
> ever committed.
> 
> Is such a history professor less culpable than the most mendacious
> politician? I think not. And what about the professor of biology or
> anthropology who, knowing of the profound differences in mentality, in
> psychology, in inborn behavioral patterns that separate the races, lets
> his students use a textbook that asserts the sameness of the races and
> fails to point out this lie? Should he be forgiven for betraying the
> trust placed in him simply because he wants to keep his job?
> 
> As I said, we live in a culture of lies. It's not just the politicians
> and the businessmen and the teachers and the news reporters who lie to
> us: it's everyone to whom the Jews have a string tied, and that means
> most people involved in shaping the popular culture: advertisers and
> entertainers and editors and publishers and writers and the rest. Here's
> an example: the February issue of Playboy magazine has been on the
> newsstands for a couple of weeks now. There's an article in the magazine
> titled "Virtual Reich," with a subhead that reads, and I quote: "Fascism
> is back, featuring a strange cast of Islamic fundamentalists, skinheads,
> and homegrown terrorists. Here's the sinister part: they're all talking
> to one another." -- end of quote --
> 
> It's a trashy article in a trashy magazine, but It mentions me at
> length, and that was my reason for choosing it as an example. And with a
> circulation of more than 3 million copies each month and probably half
> again that many readers, Playboy does have a significant role in the
> popular culture. The article is almost entirely make-believe. It has a
> few quotations from things I've written, a few quotations from other
> people, most of whom I've never met or even corresponded with, and then
> it throws us all into one pot and stirs us up as if we're part of a
> giant, worldwide, terrorist conspiracy: me along with Muslim
> fundamentalists, German and English nationalists, anti-abortionists, Tim
> McVeigh and Ted Kaczynski, nutcase Christian millennialists,
> environmental activists, and elderly SS veterans -- just about everyone
> the Jews don't like. It's not only the basic theme of the article that
> is wrong -- claiming one giant conspiracy where there is none -- but the
> details are chock full of errors too. It's clear that no one bothered to
> check the article for accuracy.
> 
> But of course, no one really cared about truthfulness or accuracy in
> this article: certainly not the publisher or any of Playboy's editors or
> the author, Mike Reynolds, who used to write for the Southern Poverty
> Law Center, the ultra-sleazy Jewish propaganda outfit run by direct-mail
> fundraising huckster Morris Dees. The purpose of the article was to
> frighten America's Joe Sixpacks and Sally Soccermoms, to send a cold
> shiver down their spines with the specter of all the bad guys who want
> to throw a crimp into their mall shopping and ballgame watching, ganging
> up on them. If you can scare them more easily by lying, then lie. That's
> the American spirit these days. The politicians lie, the teachers and
> professors lie, the media people lie, the businessmen lie, the magazine
> writers lie, and for the most part the American people don't care. Just
> keep those shopping malls well stocked and keep plenty of ball games on
> TV, and they don't care. It's the acquiescence of the American people in
> all of this lying, rather than the liars themselves, that convinces me
> that the end times are near. At least, I hope so.
> 
> You know, a few minutes ago I mentioned that before the Second World War
> the Germans wanted to get the Jews out of their country, and I told you
> part of the reason for that. The Germans saw what the Jews were doing to
> the Russians and the Ukrainians, and they didn't want to give the Jews a
> chance to do the same thing to them. From the end of the First World War
> in 1918 until 1933, there was combat in the streets of Germany's cities
> between the communists, whose leadership was heavily Jewish, and the
> Nazis. There was a real danger that the communists would win and take
> over Germany the way they had taken over Russia. And the German people
> also knew the role the Jews had had in bringing the United States into
> the First World War, causing Germany's defeat, and leaving the country
> open to the possibility of a communist takeover.
> 
> But these weren't the only reasons the Germans wanted to be rid of the
> Jews. The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World
> War. They were strongly entrenched in the legal profession, in banking,
> in advertising and merchandising, in show business, in organized vice,
> in publishing and other media. They were trying hard to change the
> spirit of Germany. They were pushing modernism in art, music, and
> literature. They were pushing for "diversity" and "tolerance." They were
> ridiculing German tradition and culture and morality and the German
> sense of personal honor, trying hard to make young Germans believe that
> it was "cool" to be rootless and cosmopolitan. They were promoting the
> same culture of lies that they have been promoting here.
> 
> That was the so-called "Weimar" period, because right after the First
> World War some important government business, including the ratification
> of a new German constitution, took place in the city of Weimar. The Jews
> loved the Weimar period, but it was, in fact, the most degenerate period
> in Germany's history. The Jews, of course, didn't think of it as
> degenerate. They thought of it as "modern" and "progressive" and "cool."
> Really, it was a very Jewish period, where lying was considered a
> virtue. The Jews were riding high. Many books have been written by Jews
> in America about Weimar Germany, all praising it to the skies and
> looking back on it with nostalgia. Even without the so-called
> "Holocaust," they never have forgiven the Nazis for bringing an end to
> the Weimar period.
> 
> There was a Hollywood film made 30 years ago, in 1972, about Weimar
> Germany. The film was called Cabaret, and it starred Liza Minelli. It
> depicted Berlin night life, with all its degeneracy, including the
> flourishing of homosexuality, and also depicted the fight between the
> communists and the Jews and the other proponents of modernism on the one
> hand and the Nazis on the other hand. The Hollywood filmmakers, of
> course, were solidly on the side of the degenerates and portrayed the
> Nazis as the bad guys, but this film is another example of the Jews
> outsmarting themselves. The Jews who made the film saw everything from
> their viewpoint, through their own eyes, and the degenerate Gentiles
> under their spell also saw things from the Jewish viewpoint, but the
> Jews apparently didn't stop to think -- or didn't care -- that a normal,
> healthy White person would view things differently. Check it out for
> yourself. Cabaret is still available in video stores.
> 
> The point I am making is this: In the 1920s, after the First World War,
> the Jews were trying to do to Germany what they began doing to America
> after the Second World War, in the 1960s. Many Germans, the healthiest
> elements in Germany, resisted the Jews' efforts, just as many Americans
> have resisted the Jews' efforts in America. In Germany the Jews were a
> bit premature. Although they had much of the media under their control,
> they didn't control all of the media. They tried to move too fast. The
> healthiest Germans resisted and beat them.
> 
> In America, in the 1960s, the Jews had almost total media control before
> they began their big push, and they proceeded more carefully. In America
> they are winning. The culture of lies has prevailed in America. It's
> still possible for Americans to win, but it's going to be a lot tougher
> this time. We'd better get started. The first step is to regain at least
> partial control of our media, so that we can begin contradicting the
> lies. This American Dissident Voices broadcast is a part of that first
> step.
> 
> Thanks for being with me again today.
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> The text below is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
> Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
> It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADV-list.
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 
> ==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to: adv-list-request@NatVan.com
> The subject of the message should be: Subscribe
> 
> ==>  TO BE REMOVED send an e-mail message to:
> adv-list-request@NatVan.com
> The subject of the message should be: Unsubscribe
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> E-mail: national@NatVan.com with comments about the broadcast. Please
> tell us if we can post your comments and, if so, whether you want your
> name or e-mail address given.
> 
> To report typos and technical errors in ADV-list or our web site, please
> write to: webmaster@natvan.com
> 
> To contact us via "snail mail," write to:
>      National Vanguard Books
>      Attention:  ADVlist
>      P.O. Box 330
>      Hillsboro, WV  24946
> 
> For more information on ours ideas and organization, visit:
> http://www.natvan.com

If you are interested in a clarity of thought missing from the
mainstream media I suggest listening to or reading this weekly
commentary.

Denton