🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:06:13 -0400, Joe Jared <joejared@osirusoft.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:37:28 -0700, your friend wrote:
>
>> On 29 Jun 2006 19:16:40 -0000, Joe Jared is 'Taylor Jimenez'
>> <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>> 
>>>Joe Jared is BEING INVESTIGATED MY THE MN ATTORNEY GENERAL!!!!
>>>
>> I prefer this post
>
>So do I.  I can empathize with people who have both a mental illness and
>are an alcoholic, simply because I actively seek treatment for both. 
>Perhaps this latest venture of his will help him to get the treatment he
>needs.


Hello Joe:

    I would like to nominate you for 'Net Sainthood for: a) patiently tolerating
Brad's nonsense and b) hoping for his eventual recovery. Perhaps when confronted
with his 'legacy' yet again  Brad will ... well, hope is a faint candle in the
wind.

Your Friend

PS: Hey Brad:

1) This is the first time Joe and I have ever corresponded directly. Sure, I've
read his posts and have some idea who he is but we've never had contact. Believe
it and step into the light of truth or stay in your dank cave of delusions. The
choice is your's, Brad.

2) Examine the evidence scientist -
     All of my recent posts have been replies to all of your posts over an 18-30
hour period to a single newsgroup. If my "spamming, harassing and stalking"  is
all over usenet it's because I allowed all the crossposts that you put into your
posts. If you do not wish for replies then why do you post?

3)  Examine the evidence scientist -
   Most of my replies are simple cut'n'pastes, just like you do Brad, of your
old posts and post about you, e.g. "Who is ... and why is he posting ... " "Brad
is a well known net kook ...  
       
   Some of your posts make you look real stupid, don't they Brad? Just think how
stupid you're gonna look in 2008 as you rant on and on about your
"INCONTROVERTIBLE, CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE"
that " IMMEDIATELY shows for certain" that Mark Fergusen is Taylor Jimenez
"THAT NO REASONABLE PERSON COULD DENY"


4) Examine the evidence scientist -
      Use your traing as a developmental psychologist and objectively examine
the data  before you. What does your analysis of your past posts reveal? What is
your diagnosis of this patient? Is this patient in need of care and assistance?
Are you able to provide such care and assistance? Can you refer the patient to
someone who can provide the care and assistance that this patient needs?