🚀 go-pugleaf

The site http://joejared.cc is updated and the 
evidence is clear. 

Joe Jared (Stephen Joseph Jared) of oretek.com and 
of osirusoft.com and of Orange, CA is THE 
extortionist and stalker "Taylor Jimenez" (the x-no-archive 
stalker and the worst Usenet stalker in history, 
author of 10,000 personal off-topic, spam defamatory 
posts and lies).

your friend <yourfriend@example.com> wrote in
news:3dfia21ki9p7g5ai91rqm6lbc4t8ava0qc@4ax.com: 

> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:06:13 -0400, Joe Jared <joejared@osirusoft.com>
> wrote: 
> 
>>On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:37:28 -0700, your friend wrote:
>>
>>> On 29 Jun 2006 19:16:40 -0000, Joe Jared is 'Taylor Jimenez'
>>> <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Joe Jared is BEING INVESTIGATED MY THE MN ATTORNEY GENERAL!!!!
>>>>
>>> I prefer this post
>>
>>So do I.  I can empathize with people who have both a mental illness
>>and are an alcoholic, simply because I actively seek treatment for
>>both. Perhaps this latest venture of his will help him to get the
>>treatment he needs.
> 
> 
> Hello Joe:
> 
>     I would like to nominate you for 'Net Sainthood for: a) patiently
>     tolerating 
> Brad's nonsense and b) hoping for his eventual recovery. Perhaps when
> confronted with his 'legacy' yet again  Brad will ... well, hope is a
> faint candle in the wind.
> 
> Your Friend
> 
> PS: Hey Brad:
> 
> 1) This is the first time Joe and I have ever corresponded directly.
> Sure, I've read his posts and have some idea who he is but we've never
> had contact. Believe it and step into the light of truth or stay in
> your dank cave of delusions. The choice is your's, Brad.
> 
> 2) Examine the evidence scientist -
>      All of my recent posts have been replies to all of your posts
>      over an 18-30 
> hour period to a single newsgroup. If my "spamming, harassing and
> stalking"  is all over usenet it's because I allowed all the
> crossposts that you put into your posts. If you do not wish for
> replies then why do you post? 
> 
> 3)  Examine the evidence scientist -
>    Most of my replies are simple cut'n'pastes, just like you do Brad,
>    of your 
> old posts and post about you, e.g. "Who is ... and why is he posting
> ... " "Brad is a well known net kook ...  
>        
>    Some of your posts make you look real stupid, don't they Brad? Just
>    think how 
> stupid you're gonna look in 2008 as you rant on and on about your
> "INCONTROVERTIBLE, CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE"
> that " IMMEDIATELY shows for certain" that Mark Fergusen is Taylor
> Jimenez "THAT NO REASONABLE PERSON COULD DENY"
> 
> 
> 4) Examine the evidence scientist -
>       Use your traing as a developmental psychologist and objectively
>       examine 
> the data  before you. What does your analysis of your past posts
> reveal? What is your diagnosis of this patient? Is this patient in
> need of care and assistance? Are you able to provide such care and
> assistance? Can you refer the patient to someone who can provide the
> care and assistance that this patient needs? 
> 
> 
> 
>