🚀 go-pugleaf

"MnD @ PLN" wrote:

> "Richard Brewer" <jackbrew@flash.net> wrote in message
> news:3A67B50B.9244F070@flash.net...
> >
> >
> > "MnD @ PLN" wrote:
> >
> > > "Amy" <dont@spam.me> wrote in message
> > > news:t6c957he3jirf1@corp.supernews.com...
> > > >
> > > > "Adam Weiss" <aw722@pdq.net> wrote in message
> > > >
> news:E45BB3BFD104CF42.3C4591C393AC0467.1DA7163986F388C0@lp.airnews.net...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bud Frawley wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:41:43 -0500, pb said...
> > > > > > > Bud Frawley in
> > > > > > >
> <50BB0B17EA1FF0AC.5F31A4E3687A8E6D.47A4B61CDC8463AB@lp.airnews.net>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >i guess you just proved you do'nt know how to read or you would
> > > know
> > > > > > > >about the black's who were disinfanchized. i bet you think they
> > > > wanted to
> > > > > > > >votre for shrub? LOL! thats a good one! they would of voted for
> > > GORE!
> > > > > > > >thats why they were kept away! i guess you also conveniently
> forgot
> > > > for
> > > > > > > >the seniors who voted for bucannon when they really wanted to
> votre
> > > > for
> > > > > > > >gore. were talking like 19,000 thousands votes for gore that
> > > were'nt
> > > > > > > >counted from these ILEGAL acts. now whos saying bullshit? why
> do'nt
> > > > you
> > > > > > > >go listen to rush fat-baugh so he can tell you what to think
> tyhats
> > > > all
> > > > > > > >your doing!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tell me more about the "black's who were disinfanchized".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Have any of them given testimony as to how they were denied the
> > > right
> > > > > > > to cast legal, valid votes?  Didn't think so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > you think they could testify with the cops waiting for them when
> they
> > > > get
> > > > > > home? ya thats funny!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If education counts, I'd say it was *you* who were
> "disinfanchized"
> > > my
> > > > > > > man.  You make me laugh.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > there was thousands who did'nt get  to vote. they showed them on
> the
> > > > news
> > > > > > the next day.if you stop listening to rush fat-baugh and pay
> attention
> > > > to
> > > > > > the news for a change you would of already know that! its called
> > > > > > discrimination! i guess you think thats a joke.ya right YOUR the
> joke
> > > > > > ifyou think that!
> > > > >
> > > > > Uh oh, you said you believe the TV.  Rabid right wingers will have a
> > > > > field day with that one.  To them the 'mainstream media' (with the
> > > > > exception of Pat O'Reilly on Fox News) is entirely controlled by a
> few
> > > > > Jewish Democrats.  They'll never tell us who those few Jewish
> Democrats
> > > > > are, but they are convinced they're there.
> > > > >
> > > > > What can be added to your statement is that in every single election
> in
> > > > > any country the margin of error is caused by things like confusing
> > > > > ballots that are combined with less than educated voters,
> heavyweight
> > > > > bureaucracy that makes it easier for people to be disenfranchised,
> bad
> > > > > counting (bad counting most of all), and yes, bigotry.  What makes
> this
> > > > > case unique is only that the margin of error was greater than the
> margin
> > > > > of victory.  That's all that really happened.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In any case, that chapter of the book (so to speak) is over now.
> Now
> > > > > John Ashcroft is having his balls grilled by the senate committee.
> It's
> > > > > sortof comical, especially when Democrat senator Ed Kennedy asks a
> > > > > question.  I say asks a question, in Kennedy's case it's more like
> makes
> > > > > an accusation.  Kennedy sais something like "you did this".
> Ashcroft
> > > > > replies.  "Did Not".  Kennedy: "did too".  Ashcroft: "did not".  And
> so
> > > > > on and so forth. :-)
> > > > >
> > > > To me, this is just a bit of "what comes around, goes around".  Janet
> Reno
> > > > was the 3rd person submitted by Clinton for the post of attorney
> general.
> > > > The Republicans are complaining about "the politics of personal
> > > > destruction".  They have been practicing it for 8 years, why should
> they
> > > > expect anything different from the Democrats?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Because, according to the 'crats, they are above that sort of thing...
> > >
> > > What a world we live in where the justification for personal destruction
> is
> > > someone else's personal destruction.
> > >
> > >             <sigh>
> > >
> > >                 Michale n Divrlady
> >
> > It's just like they taught us in the Army. If you get in the first shot,
> the
> > other guy won't be there to get you. As Delay, Armey, Gingrich, Lott,
> Nicols,
> > Helms and Ashcroft have been regularly proving over recent years, you
> can't
> > trust a conservative under any circumstances short of him being dead or in
> > prison.
> >
>
> Your bias is showing..  :)
>
>                 Michale n Divrlady

My experience is showing.