Thread View: mn.general
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Anonymous
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:05
Re: The Wallace Conspiracy - By Fut and Stoopid.
Author: Anonymous
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:05
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:05
119 lines
8351 bytes
8351 bytes
Whatever. The kind of man you are "Taylor" says it all (see below). THAT EVIDENCE IS ABOUT YOU NO MATTER WHAT YOUR NAME IS. You use a true alias (a completely false name) and stalk and harass people into newsgroups you never otherwise participate in. You are a proven forger and gladly use the usenet posting services (databasix) of a convicted child molester even though you are against child molesters (supposedly). All you are really for is un-American hoodlum suppression of everything you don't like. And, you love being a hood bully. All of the following is true and proven to be true of you, whether you are Spamford or not. All your domains are falsely registered to non-existent people and bogus addresses. But "Just Taylor" ***IS**** Spamford Wallace. Here is information on the person known as 'Just Taylor' who stalks people he does not know into newsgroups he does not participate in to harass and defame people for others. He goes by a real alias. There is NO "Taylor Jimenez" in California. He uses abuse domains and always posts off the record to further try to hide and avoid accountability. He is a triple anon coward. There is a Sanford Wallace and he posts from the same area as "Taylor". "Taylor" uses the same words (like 'larting'); behaves in the same way as Sanford; uses some of Sanford's domains (which he claims he "bought from him"); and he is the very same age and looks exactly the same as Sanford Wallace!! Sanford Wallace no longer lives at his past addresses and there is a Sanford Wallace in San Pablo, CA. He lives in the same area that would be served by the mail server "taylor" uses. "Taylor" also retaliated for Sanford in ten different newsgroups where the "open letter" (below) was posted. I wonder why he would do that??? In short it is clear that "Taylor" who is an irresponsible criminal-type stalking and harassing abuser who tries to remain unaccountable and anonymous is indeed Sanford "Spamford" Wallace. See the http://www.concentric.net/~cyberper/jimenez_wallace.htm page. As you can see, UNLIKE "Taylor", his critics go by my name and use a properly registered domain space (registered in the name of a mn family for 6 years now) to host his web pages. They are not cowards and a psychopathic type who is anon and uses falsely registered domains, like "Taylor". If you want to believe a person with a false name and using falsely registered domains, go ahead. But it is clear that "Taylor" is the psychopath and a stalker. Hell, it looks like he is connected with terroristic threats after 9-11!! The open letter to Sanford (not "Taylor), that Taylor responded to 10 times in ten different newsgroups: An Open Letter to Sanford Wallace! Sanford, it is obvious that you have gone to some lengths to protect your privacy. I respect a person's privacy. But, I question whether a person who harasses and abuses people in newsgroups he has never even participated in deserves to remain unaccountable. It is also questionable whether a person who provides services to others (hypocritical others) so they can harass people should remain unaccountable, even if your own personal posting stops. These others you perform services for have demanded (successfully) that the very sort of activities you do for them not occur or cease. They officially have considered activities like you do and facilitate "stalking and harassment". (It is possible you do not even know this because you do not know the interactions that have occurred in the newsgroup you abuse for and now abuse in! Afterall you have provided services for several years to a newsgroup you just recently have appeared in ONLY to finally do your own off-topic spam, stalking and harassment. You do not know the newsgroup just as you do not know the people you abuse.) Here's the deal. You, Sanford Wallace, cease and desist with ALL activities stalking, harassing, and abusing people and cease all activity that facilitates and encourages harassment of individuals promptly and your privacy will continue to be respected. Simply do NOTHING for the others you presently "serve" that THEY would not label as inappropriate (to say the least) IF that was done against them. It is pathetic to see a person on a power trip, where he does things for others because he can get away with it. Again, you may have not even been involved enough in any interactions with the person you harass and with those in the newsgroup you "serve" to know that all you do would officially and definitely be considered wrong by many of those same hypocritical people you serve (AND SUCH ACTIVITIES _HAVE BEEN_ DECLARED WRONG BY THESE VERY PEOPLE). True, some of the people you "serve" (as basically a cheap big-shot punk) are happy to see YOU do what they would not do themselves because they do not want to be seen doing wrong, yet like it when you do it. Hopefully, this is not enough pathetic gratification for you to continue (esp. given there will be consequence and NOT the sort you have been hoping for). (I know how you love court and like to win when YOU have been a supreme asshole, but that wish may not be forthcoming. This is your record and what makes you such a disgusting punk for the whole world. This is why Harvard voted you one of the worst people on the earth. There ARE other possible consequences -- and whoever told you that you are "smart" was very mistaken.) If you decide that it is more important for you to throw your "weight" around by doing favors for people to be a big shot (punk) and if you continue acting against people you do not know and in newsgroups you do not participate in, I believe that it will be fair to do anything to make you have more accountability. This will include revealing any and all identifying information about you. Since you have gone to some lengths to seek privacy, I believe this is something you might not want to occur. Things have gone forward to the point that it is no longer helpful to you to post through an abuse domain to do your Usenet posting and it no longer helps that you go by an alias of a person that does not even exist (as you yourself have admitted you do). You speak often like a greedy materialistic man who has money and likes to throw that around for his punk-ass power trips. But you also have your family and your privacy to consider. I suggest you stop abusing other people and continue to keep your privacy. No one wants to take that away from you. But, you also would have to become accountable by all means, if you continue your stalking and harassment of people you do not even know, in newsgroups you do not even participate in. You have facilitated and participated in harassing activities for years. You can still get a free pass (believe it or not). But this offer shall expire very shortly. I'll give you a week to correct your activities and get your activities in line with the standards that those you serve have insisted on.
Re: The Wallace Conspiracy - By Fut and Stoopid.
Author: Rob Jensen
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:07
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:07
38 lines
3206 bytes
3206 bytes
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 20:05:05 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous <nobody@remailer.privacy.at> said: >Whatever. The kind of man you are "Taylor" says it all (see below). > >THAT EVIDENCE IS ABOUT YOU NO MATTER WHAT YOUR NAME IS. You use a >But "Just Taylor" ***IS**** Spamford Wallace. > One line Just Taylor is Just Taylor, the second it doesn't matter who he is and the third line he is Spamford Wallace? You seem to pick names out of a book like RtS. First Informant is Cainman, then Cainman is Informant, then Cainman is me, then Informant is a relative of RtS, Just Taylor is Sanford, Just Taylor is Hannigan, Informant is Just Taylor. What you two do seem to know is nothing. That is for certain. >Here is information on the person known as 'Just Taylor' who stalks >people he does not know into newsgroups he does not participate in >to harass and defame people for others. He goes by a real alias. >There is NO "Taylor Jimenez" in California. He uses abuse domains >and always posts off the record to further try to hide and avoid >accountability. He is a triple anon coward. There is a Sanford >Wallace and he posts from the same area as "Taylor". "Taylor" uses >the same words (like 'larting'); behaves in the same way as Sanford; >uses some of Sanford's domains (which he claims he "bought from him"); >and he is the very same age and looks exactly the same as Sanford >Wallace!! Sanford Wallace no longer lives at his past addresses and >there is a Sanford Wallace in San Pablo, CA. He lives in the same area >that would be served by the mail server "taylor" uses. "Taylor" also >retaliated for Sanford in ten different newsgroups where the "open >letter" (below) was posted. I wonder why he would do that??? I spend a lot of time out in Sacramento, CA for work and San Pablo, CA is nowhere near the places that RtS and you have claimed Just Taylor lives. San Pablo is North of Berkeley, CA. RtS has claimed Vero Beach and Newport Beach as the his city with is in Southern California, about 350 miles away.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads