Thread View: mod.telecom
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by CMP.WERNER
Thu, 02 Apr 1987 04:29
Q: reporting (or not) your hardware to the TELCO ?!]
Author: CMP.WERNER
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1987 04:29
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1987 04:29
53 lines
3100 bytes
3100 bytes
I don't recall seeing this message make the digests. was it rejected by the
moderator or did it not arrive?
---------------
Date: Sat 21 Mar 87 04:53:52-CST
From: Werner Uhrig <CMP.WERNER@R20.UTEXAS.EDU>
Subject: Q: reporting (or not) your hardware to the TELCO ?!
To: telecom@R20.UTEXAS.EDU
In-Reply-To: Message of Fri 20 Mar 87 01:32:55-CST
Message-ID: <12288119033.25.CMP.WERNER@R20.UTEXAS.EDU>
Gary Wells <gary%percival%reed%tektronix.tek.com@RELAY.CS.NET> writes
in TELECOM Digest V6 #23 ...
> There are several methods used by the telco's for line testing. .....
> By knowing WHAT is hanging
> on the end of your cable, you can quickly tell the status of the pair AND the
> station. This is why the telco's fought so hard about registration. They
> really didn't care about the equipment, they just need to know what it
> "looks" like, for trouble isolation purposes.
HMMMM, it's been years now that I've taken the trouble to tell SWB about the
latest changes in equipment that I've connected at my end - mainly, because
it changes so often and because I'm under the impression that they don't really
care to know; or, at least, don't do anything with the information that I
give them about my latest set of hardware (besides, it often changes on
a daily basis; what with all these new modems, answering machines, phones and
other gadgets to test and play with :-)
Now, what I'd like to know is the following:
1) Can someone tell me what the phone company *SHOULD* be doing with the data
describing my hardware?
2) Is there something that I should *INSIST* that SWB do in response to me
reporting what I have connected?
3) Is there some way that I can test that they *ACTUALLY DID* what needed to
be done at their end?
4) Can not reporting my latest set of hardware lead to *DEGRADING* in line
quality somehow? for example, could this lead to degraded line quality
for data communications using a modem (especially at 2400 baud)? or to
another phenomenon, such as "not all connected phones ring during an
incoming call"?
I guess, what I really need is a pointer to a book which really all that I may
ever want to know about telephones and data-communications in a lingo I can
understand and make sense of (i.e. don't require the background and knowledge
of the lingo of a telecommunications engineer). Please, *DO* give pointers !!
---Werner
-------
Re: Q: reporting (or not) your hardware to the TELCO ?!]
Author: bob
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1987 01:51
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1987 01:51
17 lines
1366 bytes
1366 bytes
About a year ago, I got to feeling guilty with all the equipment on my
one phone line (4 phones, answering machine, modem), and wondered whether
suddently things might stop ringing, so I dutifully wrote down all the RENs,
serial numbers, etc., and called up Pacific Bell.
The fellow who answered my call was rather surprised when I told him why I
was calling. He chuckled and replied that Pac Bell's equipment doesn't care
about what you've got on your line, so their people don't care either.
I never got to rattle off my list of RENs.
--
Bob Weissman
Internet: bob@acornrc.UUCP
UUCP: ...!{ ames | decwrl | oliveb | apple }!acornrc!bob
Arpanet: bob%acornrc.UUCP@AMES.ARPA
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads