🚀 go-pugleaf

dear old barbara,

>(actually I've talked to several, including one in Toronto);
>but, the newspaper article did not say "who" or "what" I'd talked 
>about. Apparently you are assuming that if I sued, it would
>be CCN. You shouldn't make assumptions.

the assumption that i am making is that you have WAY too much time on
your hands, and you have the global perspective of a gnat.  look
around you barbara - on your television at least - can't you see that
there are far more important things going on in the world than your
rude comments?  oh sure, you can say that you have been 'raped' over
the usenet and so on and son, but really - you are not, nor will you
ever be, the foremost thinker in feminist theory.  

>However, it's not so that she is not harmed in some way by the
>withdrawal of CCN service. 

all I have to make mentio of is your copying Senator Bob Doles
campaign marketting techniques ( really stupid idea !) "she" "Barbara
Amero"

>CCN is a "Freenet". There is NO
>"alternative" Freenet service here. She would not have a tough 
>time showing that she has been harmed in some way by withdrawal
>of CCN service.
look - go to a national isp if you must.

> And I submit that she would not have a tough
>time showing that she has been harmed by particular individuals
>in here.

only so much as you have harmed.  victimization is the worst thing you
could do for yourself barbara, it prolongs any healing as opposed to
being a proponent to forgiveness and health.  drop the wounded duck
act - for all of us who know the side of you that uses the usenet as
you do - we are not shedding any tears for you.

earl