🚀 go-pugleaf

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <DJttL8.n4E@freenet.carleton.ca> Colin R. Leech 
(ag414@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:

> Rosco (Roger_Walker@CUEHere.Edmonton.AB.CA) writes:
> > Still further, what makes you believe that the minority of offenders who
> > use
> > firearms in their domestic crime, won't turn to weapons that the majority
> > use, like knives, boots, fists, a stocking, etc.?

> I'd be quite happy if they did, because there is a *much* better chance of
> the victim being alive after such an attack. How can you ignore something
> so obvious?

What is most painfully obvious is the hypocracy of C-68 proponents who claim
it will reduce crime/violence, present a silly supposition as above, and
completely ignore that the violence equation has not changed a bit. If the
object is to save lives, C-68 isn't the answer.

> Hey, if knives are as lethal as guns, why don't you hunt a moose with one?

It is not legal to hunt moose with a knife. With a moose, it is much more
difficult to kill one than with a firearm. With people, it is amply easy to
kill them quite easily with firearms, knives, cars, etc.

- -- 
               SysOp, CUE Here BBS  (403) 465-7715
                 Roger_Walker@CUEHere.bohica.net
               Roger_Walker@CUEHere.Edmonton.AB.CA

    PGP Public Key from:  Roger_Walker_PGP@CUEHere.Edmonton.AB.CA


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMOBhsaZ872JZyB+1AQGNfggAwt5c307/oEHYi0Oz975VSNhPQnMQCv44
VB0at+2JFwg/t4wko9G4mdxL4yitjsxUnViow5Wj7XervTV4iePew2u5ZcCD2RgF
FLijWOOauqfO2wS1sZduzEvQmkJClEL27KfHx+p9LL5sARhRdjI/oyF4eVQUaay5
Z7p17U06x0av9XVecp+EppbUW/Xul6tA6fkdnNfVMdR1odNLTwEx7BBRcO/1U4qs
M/X/VdHH8sreI8Xo+xVtYVbEJhWuysJYB8IpScT0Blk2KV8YKdJCDUqtqv4P4IQe
wIfnA/oYNhkTXezJrHtShKoKIVgvukK9MvFMzsVo93dp2Cbf/SDLVQ==
=m/GM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----