🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:03:14 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@Tsenuf.com> wrote:

>
>"The Watcher" <don'tgo@there.com> wrote in message 
>news:43758236.2152813@news.ritternet.com...
>> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:52:57 -0800, Don Homuth <dhomuth1@comcast.net> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:45:42 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@Tsenuf.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:SaqdnTd9r9NtKunenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> In article <dl286u$1iim$1@f04n12.cac.psu.edu>, Elmo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> God's existance -- or the lack thereof -- is not an issue that can be
>>>>>> settled
>>>>>> by scientific methods.  Nor is it in the realm of Biology.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not?  Who knows, maybe there is a signature in the 'junk' DNA. :)
>>>>>
>>>>Yes, but since the secularists BELIEVE that there is no god, in what way 
>>>>is
>>>>their "religious" fervor and zeal any different from those who believe 
>>>>there
>>>>there is a God ?
>>>
>>>So long as it is a mere Belief on either side, what cause to demand
>>>that one be superior to the other?
>>>
>>>>Frankly, except for the side of the coin they espouse, I can't tell them
>>>>apart in every other aspect of their behavior.
>>>
>>>Religionists believe there Is a god.  Or gods.
>>>
>>>Atheists believe there is/are Not.
>>
>> They do? Who told you that? I'm an atheist and I don't believe that.
>
>Then you don't know the meaining of the word "Atheist".

Wrong. I know SEVERAL meanings for it. Just because I prefer to use the one that
fits best doesn't mean I'm wrong, does it? Unless you've been appointed Grand
Poobah of the English Language, I'll continue to use that definition.
(snip)