🚀 go-pugleaf

"The Watcher" <don'tgo@there.com> wrote in message 
news:43767014.15599620@news.ritternet.com...
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:03:14 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@Tsenuf.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"The Watcher" <don'tgo@there.com> wrote in message
>>news:43758236.2152813@news.ritternet.com...
>>> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:52:57 -0800, Don Homuth <dhomuth1@comcast.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:45:42 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@Tsenuf.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:SaqdnTd9r9NtKunenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>> In article <dl286u$1iim$1@f04n12.cac.psu.edu>, Elmo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> God's existance -- or the lack thereof -- is not an issue that can 
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> settled
>>>>>>> by scientific methods.  Nor is it in the realm of Biology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not?  Who knows, maybe there is a signature in the 'junk' DNA. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, but since the secularists BELIEVE that there is no god, in what 
>>>>>way
>>>>>is
>>>>>their "religious" fervor and zeal any different from those who believe
>>>>>there
>>>>>there is a God ?
>>>>
>>>>So long as it is a mere Belief on either side, what cause to demand
>>>>that one be superior to the other?
>>>>
>>>>>Frankly, except for the side of the coin they espouse, I can't tell 
>>>>>them
>>>>>apart in every other aspect of their behavior.
>>>>
>>>>Religionists believe there Is a god.  Or gods.
>>>>
>>>>Atheists believe there is/are Not.
>>>
>>> They do? Who told you that? I'm an atheist and I don't believe that.
>>
>>Then you don't know the meaining of the word "Atheist".
>
> Wrong. I know SEVERAL meanings for it. Just because I prefer to use the 
> one that
> fits best doesn't mean I'm wrong, does it? Unless you've been appointed 
> Grand
> Poobah of the English Language, I'll continue to use that definition.
> (snip)

Then yuo're not useing the English langauge
Why don't you use a dictionary
It will save you from lokking plain stupid.